My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:33:02 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:13:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
option they have kept open. They found out from consultants that with the better <br />solutions, the companies invariably want public funding, because the DEM as a <br />government agency has access to cheaper money than the private sector. This ties up the <br />private sector's funds. The DEM had a hard time convincing the Council that it works <br />for private companies to use the government's borrowing ability, but they may finally <br />understand that. <br />The Chair asked whether the DEM has any other ideas on how its operations can be made <br />more efficient. He said that might be with the discipline issue regarding sick leave, and <br />Mr. Ho said yes, the union contracts need to be realigned. He knows the Civil Service <br />Department has that as an ongoing mission, with contracts as they come up for renewal. <br />They always check with the departments as to what sections need changing. The <br />problem is that contracts are valid state -wide, so the other counties have to be taken into <br />account. <br />Ms. Nicholson suggested that after the COGC agreed on a draft letter, it also be sent to <br />those departments that appeared before the COGC, for a two -page response. She wanted <br />to have a record of a response. Ms. Stremski agreed. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved that once they have agreed on the form for the <br />letter to departments, the COGC send one to the DEM for their response, too. Ms. <br />Stremski seconded the motion. All members voted in favor of the motion. <br />Mr. Joseph said he had two questions, out of curiosity. Does the County ever attempt to <br />find the registered owners of abandoned vehicles? Mr. Ho stated that is standard <br />procedure. The Police Department does that part. They have to make an attempt, and <br />only after that can a vehicle be labeled abandoned. <br />Mr. Joseph asked if there was a wholehearted attempt, and what the percentage was of <br />registered owners of abandoned vehicles they found. Mr. Ho said he did not know the <br />answer and would try to get the information. <br />Mr. Joseph asked who writes grants for the DEM, and Mr. Ho said they have several <br />people doing that. Their recycling coordinator has written several grants. <br />Mr. Joseph asked if there were people in the DEM who were specifically to write grants, <br />and Mr. Ho said no, that it was ancillary to all their other duties. He stated that the chief <br />of the Technical Services Section has applied for grants, and that it is in addition to his <br />other duties. He said Research and Development is heavily invested in grant writing and <br />that on one of the DEM's grants, Research and Development signaled them about it and <br />helped work with them to get the grant. But no, the DEM does not have a full -time, <br />dedicated grant writer. <br />Mr. Joseph asked if that would help the DEM be more efficient, and Mr. Ho said he <br />thought it would help. It would help to secure funding for more programs than they can <br />do now. However, he was not sure if the director would want to go that route. <br />The Chair thanked Mr. Ho and Ms. Bauman for coming, and they left at 11:40 a.m. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.