My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:33:02 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:13:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for employees. The due date would be changed to June 5 for the boards and <br />commissions. <br />After asking if there were any further discussion regarding the draft letter, the Chair <br />moved to agenda item no. 7. <br />7. DISCUSSION /ACTION ON GATHERING OF OTHER MATERIALS TO BE <br />USED BY THE COST OF GOVERNMENT COMMISSION <br />Ms. Garson said that at the previous meeting, the Reinventing Government book came up. <br />She found a description on Amazon.com, and the cost was about $17. Several books had <br />the same or a similar title, and she was not sure this was the one the letter writer had been <br />suggesting they read. <br />Ms. Cushnie suggested that since the reference was so vague, the commissioners could <br />go to Borders on their own and educate themselves, if they wanted to. <br />Mr. Joseph said they could also look in the library. <br />DISCUSSION OF ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON NEXT AGENDA <br />The Chair said that the DEM would be revisited. Ms. Nicholson asked if the <br />Environmental Management Commission would be addressed then, too, but the Chair <br />explained that we had to await their response to the letter. <br />Ms. Garson mentioned that not all the boards and commissions are convened, so <br />responses may not be received from all of them. <br />The Chair asked Mr. Joseph if he wanted the vehicle disposal issue on the next agenda, <br />and Mr. Joseph said he felt the Solid Waste and Wastewater Divisions were more <br />important. <br />The Chair asked if they could return to Solid Waste if they wanted to hear from a division <br />chief. Ms. Garson explained that they could ask for a division chief but because the <br />meeting dates are set and inflexible, they may not be able to appear. Ms. Bell had <br />originally wanted today's date moved to accommodate scheduling conflicts. <br />Ms. Nicholson suggested that if the two division chiefs cannot make it to the next <br />meeting, they should plan on having the Public Works Department appear as a back -up. <br />The Chair said that would affect the agenda, but Ms. Garson said she hoped to get a clear <br />answer before sending out the agenda. <br />Ms. Garson asked the COGC to clearly tell her what they want on the agenda. Why do <br />they want the division heads to appear and what do they want them to answer to? Ms. <br />Nicholson said they wanted a brief overview of their department and then to ask the same <br />questions that were asked of Ms. Bell. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.