Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bell said she did not mean to be defensive, but part of the problem is that they have <br />too much work. She was hoping they would have a general discussion with the COGC <br />and then zero in on things. She asked how deep they needed to go to see some synergy <br />with another department. She said the COGC is looking at the whole County, and the <br />DEM is trying to find a little something that might fit in the bigger puzzle. <br />Ms. Cushnie stated that the COGC is only convened for ten months, and they need to <br />come up with a report. She asked, if the DEM's assumption is that commercial agencies <br />pay 50% of all expenses, how close are they to that goal? <br />Ms. Bauman said the 50% goal is their estimate of their true expenditures, that it is for <br />handling the commercial trash. <br />Ms. Bell said that for tipping fees, they are at about 39 %. It is a five -year plan that <br />started three years ago. She said the next policy decision is hard: Do they charge people <br />at transfer stations? Is the COGC issue to make them an enterprise agency? Should they <br />charge residents for their trash in order to get to zero on a general fund subsidy? <br />Ms. Nicholson said that is what the COGC needs to know from the DEM. Would it make <br />sense to increase personnel to be at those transfer stations 24 hours a day? Would it <br />generate enough money to more than pay for itself? The COGC cannot answer those <br />questions, but the DEM could say to the COGC that it would help them to be able to <br />charge individuals. She said the COGC does not have the expertise to analyze that, so <br />they look to the department to bring up something that would help them, and then the <br />COGC could include it as a recommendation. <br />Ms. Bell said the short answer is that it would be more fair to charge residents. It would <br />give them the incentive to change habits. But whether it would be cheaper, probably not. <br />Ms. Cusluiie explained that the COGC's mandate is to look at the efficiency of the <br />government. She said that when she visits the mainland, she looks at different <br />approaches. Some of them may cost more, but they are fair and educate the public. She <br />asked what is being done to create a fair and equitable government situation for <br />everybody? The COGC comes around once every four years to present a department's <br />side of a dilemma, but the COGC can only do so with facts and references to other <br />agencies and government entities. <br />Mr. Joseph asked how current the sewer fees are, and Ms. Bauman said that customers <br />just received their November - December bills. There are several reasons why it is far <br />behind, including waiting for information from the Water Supply Department and <br />processing with the ordinance that took effect in October, 2005. They also don't want to <br />send out bills covering four to five months at a time in order to get caught up. It is hoped <br />that by next January or February, they will reach their goal of residential bills going out <br />within a week of the end of the billing period. However, they will still need to wait for <br />the meter readings on the commercial bills. <br />0 <br />