My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-16 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-03-16 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:31:59 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:13:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vote: The Chair called for a vote on the motion to review the Department of <br />Environmental Management first. All members voted aye on the motion. <br />The Chair clarified that the Commission was still on item 7 of the agenda and asked if <br />there were any more discussion on approach. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Stremski moved to have the Department of Public Works the <br />Commission's second priority. Ms. Cushnie seconded the motion. All members voted <br />aye on making the Department of Public Works the second priority. <br />Ms. Kaetsu said those two departments are good to start with, as some of the issues <br />overlap between them. Up until 2000, it was all one department. <br />Motion: Mr. Sakaguchi moved that at some point in the future, the Commission spend <br />time considering broad -brush recommendations. The Chair said there is not a problein <br />with agendizing something like that, that it could be placed on the agenda at any time and <br />did not need a motion. <br />Ms. Garson said that since the Commission only has eleven months, it would be good if <br />they could set a tentative roadmap down. <br />Ms. Cushnie said she wanted to have at least seven departments prioritized to make the <br />best use of time if a department representative wasn't available. <br />Ms. Garson stated it might be good to set two or three on an agenda, because the <br />commissioners might have lots of questions and want a representative to come back. She <br />is also concerned about the time if there is only one department per agenda. <br />Ms. Cushnie said she wanted to discuss Parks and Recreation, as she agreed with Ms <br />Stremski that it should be their second priority department. <br />Ms. Kaetsu said that Parks and Recreation is a big department and the commissioners <br />may want to hit areas the last Commission did not get to. If there are specific concerns in <br />an area, there is nothing to prevent them from looking at that area. Ms. Garson said they <br />could also look at something that came out of the prior COGC report, to follow up on. <br />Ms. Kaetsu also said that the Planning Department is another important department, <br />though not as large as Parks and Recreation. The Planning Department has long -range <br />responsibilities and is trying to do abetter job at integrating. She also said that since the <br />Commission was interested in liability, it may want to look at the new Risk Manager <br />position under the Department of Finance. <br />Ms. Cushnie asked how that position got created, and Ms. Garson explained that the <br />Council started discussing it, because every time there is a lawsuit and a settlement offer <br />is on the table, the Corporation Counsel has to present the case to the Council and request <br />its approval to settle. The Council always wants to know what is going to be done to <br />address the problem of future liability, so there was a collective idea to hire someone to <br />be on the lookout for potential areas of liability. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.