My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-16 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-03-16 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:31:59 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:13:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Cushnie noted Mr. Merrill's word of caution at the end of his letter, that it <br />may be difficult to get information from people if they believe their job or <br />position of authority may be threatened. She stated she hoped that it would come <br />out at today's meeting how their task would be approached, with reassurance that <br />they would not be micromanaging. <br />Ms. Stremski and Mr. Sakaguchi both stated that the issue is complicated and that <br />they don't have expertise. <br />The Chair informed the commissioners that the letter could be filed and revisited <br />later. <br />Ms. Cushme stated she would like a copy of the "Reinventing Government" book <br />and "Decisions `88" that were referenced in the communication. Ms. Garson <br />indicated she would look for those publications and if she could get a copy, she <br />would bring it for everyone to look at, depending on the cost. <br />The Chair said he had a comment on the communication - -that it was asking the <br />Commission to reinvent the wheel. He said he hopes that the commissioners look <br />for their own way of proceeding instead of looking back at what everyone else <br />did. Together they are a group and their ideas can be just as valuable as anyone <br />else's. He asked if there were a motion to file the communication. <br />Motion: Mr. Joseph so moved. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi asked if they were going to reconsider the communication later, <br />and the Chair indicated that the motion was just to file it. <br />Ms. Garson said she would follow up on the book and could agendize the matter. <br />Ms. Stremski seconded the motion to file the communication. <br />In discussion, Ms. Nicholson stated the motion was to table the communication <br />and questioned whether they could potentially look at the referenced material, and <br />the Chair responded that it could be agendized later. <br />Ms. Cushnie asked whether it was proper procedure when filing a communication <br />to send a letter of acknowledgement, and Mr. Sakaguchi stated that would be a <br />good idea. <br />Ms. Garson mentioned that these are older communications that went to the <br />Mayor, not specifically to the Commission. She said if the Commission receives <br />something, it can be acknowledged with a courtesy letter. <br />Vote: The Chair asked for a vote on all who were in favor of filing the <br />communication. All members voted aye. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.