Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sakaguchi said he hated Hilo being the center but that the Commissioners were <br />mostly from in or near Hilo. Ms. Stremski said she is retired and has no problem driving to <br />meetings in other areas, but that she would go along with whatever the others wanted. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi suggested putting this discussion on the next agenda so that at least one <br />other member, Ms. Nicholson, would be present. Ms. Garson said this should be discussed under <br />item 10 on the agenda, regarding proposed rule revisions. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi said he agreed with Mr. Joseph's suggestion that a meeting date or time <br />could be changed without changing the regulation. <br />Mr. Miyasato asked Ms. Garson if she was the counsel for the previous Commission. <br />Ms. Garson said she was not but that she did cover a few of the meetings. He said he wanted an <br />idea of whether there was much public input, and Ms. Garson said there was very little. She said <br />the prior Commission's main problem was getting a quorum. Mr. Miyasato said he feels having <br />a quorum is more important at this point than public input and that accommodating board <br />members in order to reach a quorum should be more important. He pointed out how Council <br />meetings are held during the day and people manage to give their input if they so desire. <br />The Board continued to discuss different days of the week and meeting times to try to <br />come to a resolution. An issue also was whether a conference room would be available. It was <br />also discussed that counsel needed to get a commitment from Mr. Ombac about whether he <br />would stay on the Commission if they held meetings periodically on Mondays. <br />Ms. Cushnie suggested that because at this point they have a solid core of five members, <br />they try to maintain the 1St and 3rd Thursdays of every month as the meeting date, so that they can <br />plan ahead, with exceptions being made to meet on an occasional Monday. She asked if anyone <br />present was averse to meeting on Thursdays as they are now. No one was. <br />Ms. Garson had the commission clarify that essentially it would keep the meeting <br />schedule for the 1" and 3rd Thursdays. However, she was to see if Mr. Ombac would stay on as a <br />member if an occasional Monday meeting were scheduled, with the hope that he eventually <br />would be able to come on Thursdays. <br />Ms. Cushnie said she would like to put the onus back on the Commission members not <br />present to let them know the Commission would be as consistent as possible with Thursdays in <br />Hilo, so they could change their schedule to accommodate the Commission, which would be <br />easier than changing the Commission's schedule. Ms. Stremski asked if there was any hope of <br />someone being appointed to the Commission from the 81h District, and Ms. Garson said there is <br />still hope but she is not aware of anyone in the process of being confirmed. Ms. Garson is to put <br />on the next agenda for discussion the meeting time. If it is decided that a meeting will be <br />changed from a Thursday to a Monday, it needs to be announced at the prior meeting. Mr. <br />Sakaguchi said he agreed with Mr. Miyasato that having a quorum was the first priority, and then <br />next was finding another mechanism to get public input. So the Commission decided to also <br />have a meeting on Monday, April 3, 2006. <br />Ms. Cushnie suggested moving on to the next item in the agenda. <br />13 <br />