Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Garson said privatization is a little outside of what they are to study but that it could <br />possibly be worked in when looking at specific departments. <br />Ms. Cushnie suggested, along the lines of what Mr. Sakaguchi said, that they task Ms. <br />Garson with finding two diverse points of view within the County government -- department <br />heads who will come and speak specifically about their department and opportunities for <br />privatization, and at least begin discussion on a limited basis. Ms. Garson indicated that the <br />Commission needed to direct her on which departments they wanted and not leave the discretion <br />to her as staff attorney. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi apologized and said he hadn't been very clear. He just wanted them to <br />talk story about their philosophy on the project — should they go detail by detail, requiring a lot <br />of their time to understand each department, or could they take an overview approach, just to <br />bounce ideas off each other. He said he would just like to know what each member is thinking <br />about the project. <br />Ms. Cushnie said that before she got appointed to this Commission, she had started a <br />short list of things that she'd observed on the mainland, where precedents were set by mainland <br />counties. One is the requirement for vacant lot owners to maintain their lots so they are not <br />susceptible to brush fires. These types of small inquiries are what she is interested in making to <br />various departments, on her own or with another Commission member. She said these types of <br />questions may have a small but important impact on the cost of government. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi said he believes all the members have their own ideas about issues like <br />that and that they should share ideas. <br />Ms. Cushnie said she was interested in polling the different departments, by herself or <br />with another commissioner, and ask questions of them. <br />Ms. Garson suggested that it may be more efficient for a letter to be drafted with their <br />inquiries, which could be sent to each department. From a technical standpoint it may be easier <br />to do it this way than to form a subcommittee to go in person to each department. The <br />departments will be happy to share any information they can, especially in responding to specific <br />questions. <br />Mr. Miyasato asked if anyone wanted to make a motion to break for lunch and continue <br />their meeting afterwards. <br />Mr. Joseph said they needed to establish an agenda so that the public would know what <br />would be discussed in the next meeting and questioned whether privatization should be listed as <br />a topic. <br />Ms. Garson said the way the agenda is written, they were talking about methodology. So <br />if the methodology they decide today is to start discussing the various issues, e.g., privatization, <br />they need to be specifically listed on the agenda. The commissioners were told to let their <br />secretary know what items they wanted on the agenda. <br />W; <br />