My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001-09-26 Enviromental Management Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2001-2009
>
2001
>
2001-09-26 Enviromental Management Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2011 8:06:04 AM
Creation date
6/22/2011 8:06:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes for Wednesday, September 26, 2001Page 3 of 7 <br />Mike Allen stated that what the Mayor is saying is that it is not okay to cut public jobs, but it is okay to cut private <br />jobs. <br />Riley stated that there is a large portion of money that the Mayor feels needs to be cut and Galen has been directed, <br />within his two sections, to come up with that recommendation on the budget. <br />Mike DuBois understands that the Diversion Grant Program costs $40/ton that goes to a certified recycling <br />processor. It costs us over $80/ton to throw it away. Why is the Mayor making choices to spend more taxpayer’s <br />money to throw it away rather than recycle it if recycling costs less? <br />Galen mentioned that $80/ton doesn’t really involve any cash outlay on the part of the County. <br />Peter Martin stated that the number came from a full cost accounting of the cost of dealing with municipal solid <br />waste. That includes the tipping fee, transportation, administration, equipment, fuel and personnel. Three years ago <br />it was $82.00 and it is now between $82.00 and $88.00. He will provide a detail of that to the Commission <br />members. <br />PRIVATIZATION OF THE PU‘UANAHULU LANDFILL <br /> <br />Galen stated that he is looking at this as a potential cost cutting measure, not only for the near future, but for the <br />long term. Waste Management has indicated to us that they may be willing to operate the landfill at no additional <br />cost to us preliminarily. That being the case, we can readjust the operations at Pu'uanahulu. Primary savings will <br />revolve around the equipment and its operations, as well as some personnel. We do have some vacancies that we <br />can shift existing personnel into. We have provisional hires that we could move permanent employees into or we <br />could establish a crew to clean up our transfer stations. We don’t anticipate loosing any permanent personnel with <br />the Solid Waste Division. <br />Larry Capellas stated that when we reopened the contract with the security guards, it was very specific about turning <br />away commercial loads and restricting all loads into transfer stations for residential refuse only. The security guards <br />have personality conflicts. They let their neighbors come in and dump. This is exacerbated by the fact that the <br />transfer stations are not gated. The transfer stations have to be gated. Larry states that we have no authority to fine <br />them. We have asked the Police to issue citations, but that has not been done. <br />Riley Smith reiterated that the security guards are not doing what they are supposed to be doing. If any of the <br />haulers or recyclers are aware of abuses or improper conduct by the Security Guards, they can give Larry a name, <br />date, and place <br />Jon Olson stated that when you close the transfer stations, you increase illegal dumping. People illegally dump <br />because they don’t have the resources to haul it the distance it needs to be hauled or they are afraid to face the <br />rejection at the transfer station due to the size of their load. You can’t close people off to the option of getting rid of <br />the trash because they are going to get rid of it one way or another. <br />SWAC <br /> <br />Mayor Kim’s Memo to Galen stated that he recommends the consideration of disbanding the SWAC and having the <br />Commission assume its responsibilities. However, since some members of the SWAC have been very involved in <br />process to date, perhaps some would be interested in being assigned to a working group or task force of the <br />Commission for this purpose. <br />Galen concurs with Mayor Kim and is making the recommendation that the responsibilities of the SWAC should be <br />turned over to the Environmental Management Commission. The nine Commission members represent all <br />geographic areas of the island. It’s diverse membership has business, environmental and community interests and <br />involvement. Galen recommends, "The Commission shall authorize co-chairs to send a letter to Mayor Harry Kim <br />recommending the disbanding of the existing Solid Waste Advisory Committee and in compliance with HRS 342G <br />appoint the Environmental Management Commission as the County of Hawai‘i’s new Solid Waste Advisory <br />Committee. The Commission shall also recommend that the Mayor include appropriate language that would invite <br />file://C:\Test1\minutes092601.htm6/22/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.