My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-06-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 12:52:14 PM
Creation date
6/28/2011 12:51:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br /> I got called out as the recycling coordinator to do inspections. People <br />who were applying for, participating in different recycling programs and things like that. <br />I’m not really sure that we want to incorporate all inspections. But we do want the <br />enforcement side. When there is a violation or complaint, when that building inspector <br />goes out for that new house inspection and realizes oh, there’s already an existing <br />structure on this property and it has this violation. Where do they go? Where do they <br />take it? Right now it kind of gets dropped. So I think it would be more of an <br />enforcement. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So what I’m hearing is we don’t want to try to integrate anything <br />with inspection into this particular item. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> I think that’s going to have to happen when if the county implements <br />this. They’re going to have to hash all that out then. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> So you’re saying that it does. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> It could. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> And I think it’s a preventative measure to the enforcement. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yeah. It is. It could include all that, but I think that’s something for the <br />county to debate. We could put the word inspection in there if we feel more comfortable <br />with it. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Or would you rather address inspection in a separate one that we <br />might add to our longer list. And we might refer back to this one and say that this might <br />be done in coordination with the proposed new enforcement responsibilities or <br />assignments. Feelings about this so we can move ahead? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> I was just looking for, was it just a verbal presentation? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It was verbal but we have it in the minutes. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> No, he submitted a written letter, communication. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> You don’t have to take what he recommended. We can do whatever <br />we want with it. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> But you are right. We did talk about inspections. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Because he made a presentation to the Mayor’s Office too. So, it was <br />consistent to what he presented at our meeting. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Shall we move on for now and leave enforcement as just <br />enforcement, but try to keep it at the back of our heads that we may want to do <br />something with inspections when we get to the department specific recommendation or <br />to the countywide recommendations. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.