Laserfiche WebLink
MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yeah. You do have a copy of this and you can track changes so <br />everything that I’m recommending is underlined. The 2010-2011 COGC commissioners <br />are pleased to provide an extensive list of recommendations on measures that County <br />may consider adopting to save costs and enhance revenues. In this executive <br />summary, we are – and then that’s the additional language. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay. Discussion on that change. That work for everyone? Rather <br />than taking votes on all these things, as long as no one objects, I think that’s a good <br />change. Any other discussion on that? How do you want to handle this? <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> No. I’m just trying to keep up. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So let’s look at item no. 1 which was the Consolidation of the <br />enforcement. I see that in the main statement before the justification, Eileen has just <br />madeCounty with a capital C. I’m glad you’re picking up on those little things. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Just for reference about the document when you say the county, it <br />should be capital C. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Is there a way we can just do a check throughout the whole <br />document and make sure where it says the county it’s always capital C? <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> Yes. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Justification. We have some suggested changes or additions in my <br />version and in Eileen’s version. I was just trying to beef up the justifications on all these <br />little bits so they’re more, they have more to them. But why don’t we just take a minute <br />to read both of those suggested changes. Okay, I guess the main change that I put in is <br />I wanted to reflect that discussion we had which was timely service to the public. So I <br />added that into my justification because that was part of it that a person is waiting for <br />this inspector, then waiting for that inspector, and when we can put timely service to the <br />public or service to the public in our document if that’s helpful. So, <br />MS. WONG: <br /> It seems like we could do both of these changes. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yeah. I like your last sentence. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br /> Put it together. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Cause you changed the last sentence and you changed the second. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yeah, right. I put in new language that wasn’t in there before. If we did <br />that, it would read,Consolidating enforcement efforts under one department will allow <br />for a more effective and timely response on regulatory violations that are under the <br />county’s jurisdiction. It would also allow for better interaction with State and Federal <br />agencies that may also have jurisdiction over a regulatory violation such that the public <br />is better served in resolving the issue(s). Consolidation may not require creation of new <br />positions, and may be achieved by transferring existing personnel. Consolidation of <br />9 <br /> <br />