My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-10 Board of Ethics Minutes REG pc
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2003-2005
>
2003-09-10 Board of Ethics Minutes REG pc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 1:57:58 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:55:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SC.. Maybe we can check. <br />PC.. But I'll check... yeah, I'll go ahead and check on that. <br />RW: He did...'cause on page 43 he voted... all in favor. <br />PC.. 42 or 43? <br />RW: 3. <br />PC.. Oh, 43... I was looking at 42, sorry. <br />SC.. So did we vote again? <br />RW: There's a whole procedural issue there that we went around, around on. My <br />question was aye or nay, question mark. <br />BLT: Right. <br />RW: Nay was clarified. <br />BLT: So you ended up voting again is what happened. <br />SC.. Okay... so it's okay. <br />BLT: Because the first vote there was some confusion over what the motion and <br />what the correct vote should be. <br />CHAIR: If I recall correctly... actually we only had one Petition here... one issue of <br />fairness or unfairness and so forth. <br />:30�G17smsl <br />CHAIR: We did it in two parts... we discussed in two parts... one that the letter of <br />apology in content wasn't sufficient enough, but then was the whole action <br />proper and timely... and the answer to that was no. So therefore, there was a <br />violation... which is what we voted on. <br />SC: Okay. <br />CHAIR: Am I correct? Do you think that was a sufficient... <br />SC: Then it was in two parts. <br />CHAIR: That's the way we did the vote. <br />Pa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.