Laserfiche WebLink
BLT: This does not apply, `cause they are not related to each other. <br />SC: Oh, I'm sorry, that's not the ..., I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I see that, what <br />meant was... the communication that was sent to Mr. Russi and Ms. <br />Paul... <br />BLT: Ah huh. <br />SC: That relates to communications 2004 -5. Is that correct? <br />BLT: Hang on. <br />SC: `Cause that's been taken care of. <br />CHAIR: Well, that's the reason why I want to lump the three of them together, <br />because 2004 -7 indicates that they would like to withdraw and close <br />the above - referenced. <br />SC: So they're referencing this letter then? This communication from... <br />CHAIR: No. That's not the that's February 4. <br />BLT: Yeah. <br />SC: While we're on this do we have any requests then, from Mr. Russi and <br />Ms. Paul, for discussion? <br />CHAIR: The first letter Communication No. 2004 -5, is a copy of a <br />communication to the OIP, Office of Information Practices. It's just a <br />copy to let us know. The second one is a letter to Chairman James <br />Arakaki of the Hawaii County Council and actually it is different <br />because that one refers to Mr. Hatada's situation. <br />SC: Okay, right. <br />CHAIR: 2004 -7 relates directly back to 5, and they want to withdraw. <br />SC: So, by this then, it has been dealt with. <br />CHAIR: Yeah. <br />SC: Six has not. <br />BLT: Six is not really... it's not yours. It's just a copy of something that was <br />sent to someone else. It's not requesting any action. <br />3 <br />