Laserfiche WebLink
motives was to benefit the community as a whole. Nothing more <br />and nothing less. And because of that, you should find that there's <br />no violation of Section 2 -83. Any questions? <br />RW: Is that criminal complaint still open and pending? <br />Kamelamela: That's my understanding right now. <br />CHAIR: The Board... let me interject here. For the purposes of this hearing, <br />don't want to discuss the criminal aspects. <br />RW: Okay. <br />CHAIR: It has no bearing in my eyes. <br />RW: Okay, then let me move into another... did Mr. Manago ever testify <br />before the Council prior to this March testimony? <br />Kamelamela: , whether he had testified previously. <br />RW: Yeah, was this a recurring thing he had done? <br />Kamelamela: I have to tell you that other Police Commissioners... <br />RW: <br />Kamelamela: Yeah, well, because of the pending criminal, I advised him not to <br />testify, . If I were to tell you what he tells me that's a <br />RW: Well, when... what was Manago actually authorized by the Police <br />commission to represent them before the Council on this March <br />testimony? <br />Kamelamela: See, again there's a disagree Judge deSilva and <br />myself as to what you're talking about now. I'm saying that he was <br />authorized to talk about this issue before the County Council. He <br />sees it different. But to me you're not here to decide that issue. <br />CHAIR: That's correct. And here again, I may interject, it's part of our <br />consideration as to whether or not Manago had a legal right to <br />testify. <br />RW: Well, he had a legal right, I'm just trying to get the whole event that <br />transpired in my judgment to make a sound conclusions as to <br />whether or not there was a violation, because that's relevant. <br />19 <br />