My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2003-2005
>
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:01:07 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:55:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KI: I do have one question, and I don't know, maybe Pat or Bobby Jean can <br />answer. And the question is, why would attorneys be exempted? If they're <br />doing basically the same job <br />CHAIR: -- because they're special, I guess- <br />KI: - -I mean, if they're all lobbyists for somebody. <br />BLT: You'll notice that in italics in the paper that I , I did not that under <br />state law, that attorneys, if they were lobbying, are required to register. The <br />County Code has not been amended, and so that would be something that, if <br />you think the Code should be amended, you could make a proposal and send it <br />up to the County Council to make it consistent with state law, which requires <br />that when they are lobbying, attorneys are required —there is some language <br />that on certain things, when they're basically acting in an attorney capacity, <br />like before an adjudicatory board, that maybe they don't. But on other issues, <br />when it's trying to get something passed through the Council or Planning <br />Commission, or in this case the State Legislature, they have file. <br />CHAIR: Okay, so do we have a sense from this Board that attorneys should be included <br />within the scope of logic, as well, on what are clearly logic matters, and is <br />there a motion that we should render an opinion on that? <br />PKO: No, I don't think you should render an opinion. It would be suggested <br />legislative change, but you know, you should take it up separate from <br />considering this proceeding. <br />CHAIR: Okay, but you bring it back up, okay. <br />FUKE: I still have some more questions. Maybe I can just kind of go over <br />CHAIR: - -but that brings up an area, let me just make a note of that, <br />FUKE: Maybe I can just kind of like go over all of those, and you can make your <br />determination accordingly. <br />CHAIR: Okay. <br />FUKE: And it says if you spent more than $275 in any reporting lobbying period, or <br />you spend more than five hours in any month, I would assume that month is <br />the calendar month —it's a calendar month, right? Okay. So, if you do not <br />spend more than $275 or if you do not have more than five hours in any month, <br />then do you still need to report—do you still need to have such a <br />You don't need to file it <br />CHAIR: No, it doesn't say that, no. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.