Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kawahara moved to accept and file Ms. Schuster's financial disclosure; Mr. Joseph <br />seconded the motion; and the three members present voted aye on the motion. <br />Mr. Joseph moved to defer acceptance of Mr. Pleau's financial disclosure until <br />clarification could be obtained; Mr. Kawahara seconded the motion; and the three <br />members present voted aye on the motion. <br />6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />a. Petition No. 2005 -05: Review draft of Informal Advisory Opinion on Mr. <br />Frankel's petition regarding Mr. Arakaki's receipt of gifts to his legal defense <br />fund. Ms. Leithead -Todd pointed out that since Mr. Williams was recused as the <br />chair on this case, and Mr. Inouye was not able to be present at today's meeting, <br />there was no quorum to hear this issue. It was questioned as to whether Ann <br />Lum, who is expected to be appointed to the Board soon, could vote on this issue <br />later. Ms. Leithead -Todd said that as long as Ms. Lum is given opportunity to <br />read the minutes and review the documents, she can vote on the issue. <br />Mr. Kawahara, who had previously submitted his resignation, said that he will <br />make it official to extend his term indefinitely, until such time that he is not able <br />to carry out his duties due to other commitments. He requested that the Board's <br />staff write a letter for him to Mayor Kim regarding this, as he had received a letter <br />from the Mayor asking him about this. <br />b. Petition No. 2005 -06: Review draft of Declaratory Ruling on Mr. Frankel's <br />petition seeking a decision regarding interpretation of the law as it relates to <br />financial disclosure forms. Ms. Leithead -Todd pointed out that Mr. Frankel's <br />petition had also stated that the financial disclosure form is not clear on providing <br />information on mutual funds, and that the Board had inadvertently neglected to <br />address this part of the petition. People who have payroll deduction into a <br />deferred compensation program may have the money invested in mutual funds. <br />Ms. Leithead -Todd said that Mr. Frankel is assuming that people are in the <br />retirement system. She said most people aren't even aware of where their funds <br />are being held or invested, as this is done through the Employees' Retirement <br />System. She said didn't know if the Board wanted to add anything to the draft <br />opinion on this, or just adopt the opinion as is and leave the issue up to the <br />discretion of the employees, whether they have to list mutual funds. She said Mr. <br />Frankel was generally saying that people in the ERS have mutual funds and <br />should disclose that, but most people don't know where their money is. <br />The Chair said the draft of the Informal Advisory Opinion didn't answer the <br />question about spousal finances and that he wants a paragraph in there about the <br />Board pursuing an amendment to the Ethics Code so that its requirements are the <br />same as the State's requirements. This should be put on the January agenda. Ms. <br />Leithead -Todd read aloud her suggested sentence to include in the opinion: "The <br />Board discussed the differences between the State Code and County Code and <br />3 <br />