My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-11 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Nonverbatim
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-01-11 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Nonverbatim
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
disclosing. He noted that the Board had requested that Ms. O'Toole draft an <br />ordinance to amend the financial disclosure form so that it required information on <br />the financial interests of spouse and children. Mr. Ashida said he is okay with <br />elected and appointed officials having to provide the additional information, but he <br />has reservations as to whether volunteer citizens should have to disclose even more <br />information than they already do. He said the form as it is currently already asks an <br />applicant if there is any potential conflict of interest, and he feels that is a sufficient <br />background check. <br />The Chair questioned whether the Code could be changed so as to particularize the <br />financial interest disclosure for elected officials and appointees. <br />Mr. Joseph questioned how the State government handles this issue, as he wants the <br />County to be in line with the State. <br />Ms. O'Toole said she will research how the State handles it. <br />Mr. Joseph moved to defer this issue for further research by Ms. O'Toole; Mr. <br />Inouye seconded the motion; and all members voted aye on the deferral. <br />d. Discussion on proposed amendment to the Code regarding the registration of <br />lobbyists: Ms. Lum said she tried to figure out why attorneys are exempted from <br />registering. She wanted to know if there was anything positive in exempting them. <br />Ms. O'Toole said she could only guess at the reason and said the Board might want <br />to get feedback from the bar association on the issue. <br />The Chair asked if the Board wanted to pursue this. Mr. Inouye said the Board <br />should move forward as is, and Mr. Joseph agreed. Mr. Inouye moved to accept the <br />proposed ordinance and to move forward in changing the lobbying section of the <br />Code. Ms. Lum seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. Ms. O'Toole was <br />requested to follow up on having the proposed ordinance presented. <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Petition No. 2005 -05: Review draft of Informal Advisory Opinion on Mr. Frankel's <br />petition regarding Mr. Arakaki's receipt of gifts to his legal defense fund: Chair <br />Williams recused himself, and Vice Chair Kawahara assumed the role of Chair. He <br />asked if the Board had any comments on the proposed draft. <br />Mr. Joseph questioned the conclusion section, concerned that if the monies have <br />been turned into political campaign contributions, there may now be a violation of <br />the legal amount to contribute. <br />The members discussed changing the wording of the conclusion and decided to cross <br />out the words "complying with" and replacing them with "as defined under." Ms. <br />Lum moved to so amend the conclusion, Mr. Inouye seconded the motion, and all <br />members voted aye on the amendment, with recused Chair Williams abstaining. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.