My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-03 Board of Ethics Minutes Special Meeting kd
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-08-03 Board of Ethics Minutes Special Meeting kd
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:42 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RW: And he having already been aware of the State Ethics ruling, I presume. <br />GS: Yes sir, Mr. Chairman, when I looked at the complaint and I thought to myself that I am <br />allowed to send the information out. So I looked at the first one. I couldn't find anything wrong <br />with it, but I sat down with my aide Ashley, and I said that I think maybe there was an <br />inadvertent situation that occurred here. And that is where I was getting to in my explanation, if <br />I am allowed to continue.... <br />RW: Yes. <br />GS: So, when we sent this out, I had personally seen this document and signed it myself. <br />Reviewing it and feeling that there was no impropriety at this particular document... <br />RW: What was the date of that? <br />GS: That's the date of June 6, 2006. <br />RW: Okay. <br />GS: If you reference that one and look at that one and the other mailing, my signature situation <br />is different. That is my explanation. Now come July of this year I had, we had made the website <br />and it was going through some tweaking effort and which, incidentally, we really didn't reference <br />it as apolitical website, it was just an informational website. I don't have anything to do with <br />fundraisers there or any of that nature. It's just primarily the same information, but, I guess with <br />a political stance to it. So when I reviewed it, I believe that there could have been an inadvertent <br />issue there that I didn't catch at the beginning. But wanted to at least address this body so that <br />you know that the minute we discovered this, I felt that rather than go any further we stop the <br />mailing with that reference of website. And I decided that if there was going to be any reference <br />to it from this body, that I should pay and at least acknowledge that if there is an impropriety- - <br />which I believe was inadvertent - -and I don't believe that it was an impropriety, because I think <br />you have to have a motive to do that. My motive was purely to communicate to my <br />constituency. So moving back then, come July, my website finally was finished. And I was on <br />the road at various meetings and my secretary, Linda Swallow said "I've got the second mailing <br />document ready for your approval" and I said okay, go ahead and just read it to me over the <br />phone. And so I was driving, I was on my cell phone. And so she read the whole thing and then <br />she indicated, she said "Please check the... (you know, because everything was the same as the <br />first mailing) but she said "I added, Please check out my website at my Gary safari k.org." <br />RW: Your secretary took up that issue on that? <br />GS: Yeah, she put -- because I had said we needed to have an email address. <br />RW: I see. <br />GS: So, I didn't -- I really did not, as much as I thought about it that day - -I didn't recognize that <br />this was a political website, and that it needed to be at my County email address, there, rather <br />than my website. When I discovered it, that's when we decided that we were going to -- whatever <br />the issue may have been as far as cost and postage type things- -that we would just pay for it out <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.