My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-03 Board of Ethics Minutes Special Meeting kd
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-08-03 Board of Ethics Minutes Special Meeting kd
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:42 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WJ: But, if I could continue on that. It may be legal to do this, but as a constituent from your <br />district, as a voter of the State of Hawaii, I always thought this was an unfair advantage that an <br />incumbent could do this during an election year. And... <br />RW: Or anytime, or only during an election year? <br />WJ: Well, specifically doing it in an election year. When I personally received it in July, I <br />thought it was just a campaign message, and I had the same thoughts. It is on an official <br />letterhead. You are using the power of incumbency to promote yourself during an election year <br />and it does show an unfair advantage to those that are running against you. I personally would <br />have hoped an elected official would have used their own funds and not use taxpayer dollars in <br />doing this. I fortunately, again yesterday, received your beautiful color advertisement in the <br />mail, promoting yourself as a politician and I know that was at your own expense. But what also <br />bothers me is you say that when you discovered - -now, if not for the fact that someone brought a <br />petition against you - -would you have discovered it? <br />GS: No. I think that I would have probably; it would not have been readily evident to me that <br />this was a problem. That there was a problem with this website, it would not have been. I would <br />have, I believe, caught it. I don't know that it would have been at that particular time. I think <br />where I would have caught is after I was going to do the third mailing, because I think that on the <br />third mailing we were looking at not doing a mailer, that I was going to utilize my district <br />account which is authorized us to do that, because, come July, I believe it was July 25th was the <br />last filing deadline for running for office. And I made a mental note that I wasn't do anymore <br />district type mailers utilizing district funds anytime after that because I was following the rule of <br />the State Legislature. We don't have a rule like that with the County, but I was sensitive to it. <br />So, I think to answer your question, I would have found it. But, I probably would not have <br />found it as quickly, sir. <br />WJ: I guess the only other comment I would have to say is when you make a mistake I think it is <br />good to admit that you made a mistake, and unfortunately I haven't heard you say that. <br />GS: Well I sure admitted that I have made this error in this putting my website. There is no <br />doubt about it. That's why I felt that I was compelled to pay that particular portion back, but I <br />want this body to know that it was not done maliciously. I did not do it consciously to have an <br />unfair advantage because I think I view that comment that you made from the stand point of <br />being when I wasn't an elected official. I would have probably had the same feeling, `cause that <br />is the way the way you view the rule. When I am an elected official I wonder, just because it <br />was an election season, does that mean that we stop representing the people. That is the other <br />side of the brain that I thought about. I still represent the people, even though I have to go out <br />and sign wave, like I did this morning. I still have to come over here and conduct my business, <br />because that is what I am responsible for. I felt that the only way that the people of Puna are <br />going to recognize what has been happening in a positive sense, because we've had such a bad <br />reputation over the years, and very little infrastructure and improvements that this was a way of <br />showing the people, especially at this time frame that even though, in the past Puna has not been <br />identified as a priority, that Puna has now been identified as a priority for administration <br />(inaudible). <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.