Laserfiche WebLink
AL: ...in that he listed his campaign website in his letter. <br />RW: I second that. That is a good point. <br />AL: Yeah, the violation is because he listed the website. <br />RW: Good thing we don't have to write a whole paragraph, huh? <br />BLT: Actually, Mr. Chairman, I will probably be drafting something that looks similar to the <br />State Informal Advisory Opinion where I will layout the various pieces of information. I will <br />have references to the letters and quote the language of the letters, and I will also make <br />references to the various informal advisory opinions that I presented to you so that it is a full and <br />complete. And then at the next meeting you can review what I draft and if it does not reflect <br />what the Board feels reflects what occurred at this meeting - -the information that you had - -you <br />can make amendments to it. So I will provide it as a proposed order for you. <br />RW: So say it to me. Let me hear the following language one more time, Karen, and I will <br />recap and we will give it to the real wordsmith among us. <br />KD: Okay, let me see if I have this right, now, motion; We find Councilmember Gary Safarik in <br />violation of Hawaii Ethics Code 2- 83(b)(3) on his second mailing in that he listed his campaign <br />website, and he has so acknowledged and made restitution for it. <br />AL: I second it. <br />KD: Thank you. <br />RW: All in favor? <br />WJ: Any discussion? <br />RW: Discussion first? Any further discussion? <br />BLT: There is one thing that you may want to address, and perhaps acknowledge. Mr. Safarik <br />reimbursed the County to the tune of $252.00. The information I have from Ms. Kiriu indicates <br />that the actual costs of the July mail out, because she prevented further Xeroxing, and further <br />mail outs, was actually in the neighborhood of $125.34. The Board has the authority, though, to <br />accept Mr. Safarik's payment even though it is above the actual cost of the mail out as a <br />appropriate restitution and you could say that perhaps to reflect that it also takes care of any time <br />that may have been spent by employees in the production of the document, that the $252.00 <br />dollars.... <br />RW: Mr. Safarik are you willing to ante up. <br />GS: Yes, I would like that. <br />RW: So, is there a motion to accept the full $252.00? <br />22 <br />