My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-09 Board of Ethics Minutes regular
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-08-09 Board of Ethics Minutes regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:50 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also disclose this at the special meeting and that if any of the members had gone to the website, <br />they should disclose that at the meeting as well. <br />The Chair said he will disclose that he knows all three principals, and Ms. Leithead -Todd <br />said he should also disclose that at the special meeting. <br />Upon checking with the Council staff, Ms. Leithead -Todd informed the Board that the <br />special meeting of August 30, 2006, would be held in the County Council Room, which had just <br />been reserved for them. <br />Ms. Leithead -Todd said the announcement of the meeting has to be posted six days prior <br />to the meeting, but she will try to have it done sooner. The six days' notice is the normal <br />Sunshine Law requirement. <br />The Chair said to let the record reflect that a special meeting has been scheduled for <br />Wednesday, August 30, 2006, to address the petitions by Ms. Kinimaka - Stocksdale and Mr. <br />Olesen. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to accept and file Communication No. 2006 -79, <br />Mr. Inouye seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />5. NEW BUSINESS <br />Review of Disclosure of Financial Interest statements: The secretary informed the <br />members that item 5a should not have been on the agenda, as there were no regular session <br />financial disclosures to review. <br />Review of Gift Disclosure Statements: The members reviewed the gift disclosure <br />statements of council members Peter Hoffmann and Virginia Isbell. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Sharpless moved to accept and file the gift disclosures, Mr. <br />Inouye seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Financial Disclosure Subcommittee Report: Ms. Lum distributed a typed report she had <br />compiled on what she and Ms. Sharpless had been studying. The first issue they researched was <br />which boards and commissions require members to file financial disclosures. It seemed to be <br />that if a board had adjudicatory power, the members would need to file disclosures. If a board is <br />advisory only, the filing of financial disclosures is not required. <br />The Chair asked about whether new boards or commissions needed disclosures filed. <br />Ms. Lum said if they have adjudicatory powers, it would be required, but if they were only <br />advisory, then disclosures would not be required. She said when boards and commissions are set <br />up, it should be decided whether they have powers. Since the Cost of Government Commission <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.