My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-10-11 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-10-11 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:59 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes - Regular Session <br />October 11, 2006 <br />Ms. Sharpless said that she would like the items to reflect the County Code <br />,'verbatim." She said if we are not going to follow the State disclosure, then she would <br />like our Disclosure Form to reflect, verbatim, the County Code. If we interpret, or make <br />it simpler, we change the standard by which someone could be judge by this. She would <br />like to see the County Code actually quoted within the Disclosure form. <br />Ms. Leithead agreed some portions of the County Code that have been left out of <br />the Disclosure form. By quoting the Code it will make it easier for people to understand <br />what it is that they need to do. <br />Mr. Joseph wanted to know what happens when you have a person on a board or <br />commission who blatantly refuses to complete a disclosure statement. <br />Ms. Leithead -Todd referred to the County Code which states that a penalty could <br />be in order. The appointing authority has the power to discipline. If a candidate fails to <br />file a disclosure they can be fined a $1,000 penalty and one year imprisonment. If a <br />board member (officer) refuses to file then their appointment could be revoked. The <br />disclosure is a duty of your appointment. <br />The secretary of the Board of Ethics is maintaining a database that reflects the <br />date that all Board members have filed their disclosures. The chair suggested that the <br />secretary call the board secretaries of the delinquent members. If the board member <br />refuses to submit a disclosure then we should let the appointing authority know. If we <br />still receive no response the Board of Ethics secretary will compose a letter for the chair <br />to sign and it will be forwarded to the board secretary for action. <br />Ms. Sharpless asked if we needed to add these functions into the Board of Ethics <br />rules of practice and procedures. If oversight of the compliance of the Ethics Code is a <br />function of this committee, then we will have a process for enforcement. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Sharpless moved to thank Ann Lum for her diligent work on the <br />revised financial disclosure form and requested that the form be edited, as directed by <br />Bobby Jean Leithead -Todd, to include the exact wording of the County Code for Items 1 <br />thru 9 and change the financial coding up to one million dollars. Ms. Lum seconded the <br />motion; all members voted aye; motion carried. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Sharpless moved to request that the issue of compliance with <br />our Financial Disclosure rules and form be place on the next meetings agenda under new <br />business in terms of review of our Rules of Practice and the Board's role in recordation, <br />review, and compliance. Mr. Joseph seconded the motion; all members voted aye; motion <br />carried. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.