My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-13 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-12-13 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes - Regular Session <br />December 13, 2006 <br />BLT: I think the concern was that there had been impeachment proceedings made <br />against council members and none of the people that signed the petition were even in the district <br />that had elected them, so it was people trying to get rid of them who didn't live in their district. <br />AL: And had never voted for them. <br />BLT: Usually it was the marijuana, an issue that in their district that was not an issue. <br />There was some concern and that had some of the rationale behind those changes. Some people <br />would be truly offended if, not only was it more difficult to seek impeachment, but once you got <br />to court someone raised the argument that you don't have jurisdiction. <br />AL: Yeah, that's what I am concerned about. Somebody could say that "It's really <br />sloppy here, you don't have jurisdiction over any of it" then they say who does. Well, if circuit <br />court doesn't have it then who does? <br />BLT: I think that on the state level an impeachment proceeding of the Governor is <br />handled in the state legislature, not in the courts. <br />AL: The governor... <br />BLT: Normally an impeachment in a legislative type of a scheme is something that is <br />done by the membership of the body or by the legislature of the elected official. In this case, one <br />where the electorate drafted and approved of, the charter decided that they wanted it in the hands <br />of a judge as opposed to in the hands of the other council members. When you try to impeach all <br />nine (council members), which has happened before, obviously they can't sit in on their own <br />impeachment. <br />AL: Well, I think this is something that we should support. <br />BLT: Basically, what you would be doing is authorizing your chairman to send a letter <br />on behalf of the board supporting the legislation when it shows up. I would track it and when it <br />came up for hearing I would prepare a letter for the chairman to submit saying that you have <br />received communication from the Honolulu Ethics Commission and you support this amendment <br />to the law to remove any ambiguity about jurisdiction. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Lum made a motion that we support this effort by Honolulu Ethics <br />Commission to clarify the circuit court jurisdiction over impeachment; Ms. Sharpless seconded <br />the motion; all members voted aye, motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.