My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-01-10 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2007-01-10 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:03:24 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes of Regular Session <br />January 10, 2007 <br />AL: You can kind of scan through it to find the part that you are looking for. <br />BLT: I am looking at that. <br />AL: I don't think the examples need to be in a different typeface, but I think examples <br />of practice. If you get too many, because we have bold and all these paragraphs and two <br />columns and if you add another face it makes it kind of chop suey. So by having, it is so <br />definite, examples of prohibited exceptions. <br />BLT: This is the area where it is different from the State Ethics Guide. The State Ethics <br />Guide does not have a section where it shows examples. <br />AL: I think it is important to have examples. <br />BLT: The examples are taken from ethics opinions where there have been incidents <br />over selling tickets on government property or using government computer, that kind of thing. <br />Feel free to question things. On the last page, where it talks about the last section, financial <br />disclosures, I started looking at it and this is a little bit different from what the State Ethics Guide <br />and that is because we have these different sets of disclosures. I am still toying with the <br />employees. If that should be stretched out with bullets to make it easier for someone to note if <br />they are a Liquor Commissioner or a Building Inspector, that they are supposed to file. I did not <br />get to the last section on when you are supposed to file the disclosure; where do you get the <br />forms, what is an informal advisory opinion, what is a formal advisory opinion, and what are <br />enforcement penalties. I am still working on that section. It made sense to include that in the <br />guide. Then, the last two pages I have not really changed, except I changed it to two columns, <br />and that is the check list. I don't know if the two columns work on the check list, or leave it the <br />way it was. <br />RW: This is better that flipping page after page. I like it the way you have it. <br />BLT: Okay, so anyway, it is work in progress. <br />AL: It is coming along. <br />BLT: I think being able to initially give it to new employees, but not just employees. <br />Once finalized everyone on the list that is supposed to file, supervisors, planners, etc., they <br />should all get a copy of it because they are the people that are most impacted by the ethics code. <br />They are the ones that are positions in which they can get into trouble. If you go to the Mauna <br />Lani to inspect a building and they say "Lets play a round of golf' or "Hey, would you like to <br />spend the night ?" I am just throwing that out. Those are the types of positions that actually go <br />out and deal with members of the public away from the office where the greatest potential for <br />influence can occur. It is things like tickets to golf tournaments. I can remember one gift when I <br />was on the County Council that someone had sent me. Two nights at a hotel, $100.00 gift <br />certificate for food, and one more thing that came with it. I remember looking at it and thinking <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.