Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes of Regular Session <br />March 14, 2007 <br />BLT: Oh, it should have said "pursuant to ..." <br />AL: I just wondered if that was a special kind of language. <br />BLT: No. <br />AL: Also, on the second paragraph from the bottom "nay, they ..." These things don't <br />show up in your spell check, right? <br />BLT: Yeah. <br />AL: "... any" after a certain time you never see it. <br />BLT: Which? <br />AL: Next to the last paragraph in the right hand column second line "... on behalf of <br />[a]ny person." It is just a typo. Do you see it? "nay ..." <br />BLT: Wait, page 3? <br />AL: Page 3, second to the last paragraph "...the term represents means to engage in <br />direct communication on behalf of [a]ny ..." See, you have been looking at it too much. <br />BLT: Oh, okay. <br />AL: The next page, you can tell I was looking at this. I have to proof my husband's <br />stuff all the time. <br />WJ: You must be good at it. <br />AL: As long as it is not spelling, I see stuff, but spelling I'm terrible. We are on <br />page 4 and I have lots of little notes, but I think you might have done these things. Oh, I know <br />what it is. Financial Disclosure, who must file, public disclosures, confidential disclosures, okay <br />see list, right? Then it says employees. Then when it says when to file a disclosure we show <br />officers and regulatory employees, but up on the top, when we say who must file ... You see <br />what I am saying we don't relate the employees there to officers and regulatory employees. We <br />don't categorize like the same. I'm not sure how ... <br />BLT: I should make them regulatory. <br />AL: Called regulatory employees? <br />BLT: Well, actually ... <br />2 <br />