Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes of Regular Session <br />May 9, 2007 <br />KD: I can certainly go ahead and look at that and see if we can put that in. <br />JD: This is really nice. <br />KS: In terms of font, I can read this. These glasses, these are the wrong glasses and my eyes <br />have expired and I can read this one. <br />AL: Style -wise, I'm not fond of bold and underline on the same thing, but that is just a thing <br />of mine, nit - picky. <br />KS: I think this is easier to read than this for some reason, or it is just my crazy eyes. It might <br />be those sans - serifs. <br />KD: You don't like bold and underline, you were saying? <br />AL: No, I don't like bold and underline together. <br />KD: You like it better if it is just either underlined or just bold? <br />AL: In this case, bold would be it. I think underlines, unless they are actual professional lines <br />you put in, they mess up the descenders, you know the y's and the q's and the g's it makes it <br />harder to ... this is a different font. The introduction is a different font. <br />KD: Yes, the intro is a different font and so is the table of contents. <br />JD: I think it is a cleaner font. <br />KD: The intro? <br />JD: Yes. <br />AL: Yeah, that's because it doesn't have the little lines on it. But as far as reading, it is <br />probably easier to read the other one. But, I like your little gizzies here by the .... <br />KD: Those are supposed to be little mazes. <br />KS: Little mazes? <br />AL: Yeah, see those little gizzies, those are mazes. <br />KD: See the whole thing has a concept to it, because here he is confused and inside are the <br />little mazes. <br />KS: Yeah. <br />AL: A little too subtle for me. <br />15 <br />