Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes of Regular Session <br />May 9, 2007 <br />AL: Annual income ... the source, nature and amount of all income received during ... well <br />we could use different words. <br />WJ: Okay, try something because for services rendered is the sticking point with a lot of <br />people with this. <br />AL: Income received during the preceding year, so 2 -91.1, what's 2.91? 2- 91.1(c)(1). So how <br />are we going to distinguish that from the income received in sections 3? <br />BT: Well, Item 3 is not income. <br />WJ: Yeah, it's not income. <br />BT: It's whether you own a business, you know. <br />AL: Oh, alright, then we could just say annual income in excess of $1,000. <br />WJ: Gee, where did I hear that? <br />AL: I was just thinking it had to be salary rather than income from interest, but that other <br />interest income is over here. <br />WJ: I think by wording it like that we'd get exactly what we .... <br />AL: What we want. <br />WJ: What we intended to get, right. <br />JD: Okay, so take out for services rendered, add a period after $1,000? <br />AL: Annual income in excess of $1,000. You want address, source, amount, occupation? <br />Now we are back to occupation again. <br />JD: That is what we were discussing last time. <br />AL: Last time, yeah. <br />WJ: No, but that's okay. The word occupation is okay because if you are listing the source of <br />income as unemployment insurance then you are unemployed, and social security insurance you <br />are retired. <br />KS: Housewives or homemakers. <br />WJ: Right, so the word occupation is fine. It was just services rendered that I think a lot of <br />people got stuck with. <br />20 <br />