My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-09-12 Board of Ethics Minutes mc
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2007-09-12 Board of Ethics Minutes mc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:05:27 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
because I had not had an opportunity to discuss the matter with my board <br />of directors. <br />CHAIR: I think anybody that knows any County politics knows that you are on the <br />Planning Commission. I mean, I knew you were on the Planning <br />Commission, and I've never met you before. And I think that's why this <br />letter was received in a negative way, was because of the way you said <br />things —not what you said, but how you said it. And—of course, Linda <br />Berry also had a response just a couple of days ago, I believe, as well. <br />And I made copies of that letter and shared it with the Board members as <br />well. But it's up to the Board to decide. <br />LUM: I think the difficulty is, when we write something, those of you who are <br />writers more than I, it can take a tone down in black and white that <br />perhaps is or is not intended. But be that as it may, when we are on these <br />boards and commissions, and that was my thoughts all the way in this <br />morning, it's a small place and people know who we are, and they <br />associate us with those things that we —those organizations that we are <br />involved in. And whether we sign as Board of Ethics or Planning <br />Commission or any of these things, our name is still on it. And in that <br />respect, perhaps, as our responsibility to the public, we maybe have to <br />tone our own First Amendment rights as little bit so that we don't get these <br />big flaps. I don't think thatI don't see this is an ethics violation here. I <br />see it as perhaps a cautionary tale that we all have to look at when we're <br />dealing with the public and we're in the public eye in some way. We have <br />a little bit more responsibility to be calmer or—keeping our tones a little <br />softer. <br />CHAIR: Iif I might, I'd like to hear from Lori Enriquez. No —Mrs. Siracusa, if <br />you don't mind, you could stay right there. <br />ENRIQUEZ: Aloha. Well, this is the first time I've ever come before you to speak, and <br />the reason why I am here is because I have been watching this whole thing <br />unfold, and all of the letters to the editor, and I watch the blogs. And I live <br />in an area called Kaohe Homesteads. We're a very rural residential <br />community above Pahoa Town. And there was a certain Mr. Henderson <br />— <br />I don't remember if you guys recall the 80 -acre parcels along the highway <br />that goes to Leilani Estates. And it just seemed really odd to me that yes, <br />there was this letter written by a Linda Berry, unfortunate circumstances, <br />and it's unfortunate that Rene chose to respond, and maybe the tone of her <br />letter could have been toned downI think she was giving factual <br />information. And then this letter comes out, and it's "commissioner <br />chastised," is the title of the letter. And I looked at the letter, <br />commissioner chastised, who is this, what is this talking about. And then I <br />started reading it, and this was obviously somebody who was upset and <br />really attacking Ms. Siracusa. And then I turned to the blog, and he says <br />that he has never met this woman. And I would like to give you a copy of <br />that blog, because—it says here, "Now like you, Ms. Siracusa, I do not <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.