My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-12-12 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2007-12-12 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:06:11 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chair commented that it has taken 16 months to get to this point. Since he was the <br />initiator of the recommendation, he personally would like to see it go forward. <br />The Board members discussed Mr. Ashida's December 6, 2007, letter on the use of <br />County funds for mail -outs, as well as Board member John Dill's December 10, 2007, letter on <br />the subject. <br />The Chair said he liked the word "recommend," as suggested in Mr. Ashida's letter, as <br />the Board would just be recommending that incumbents not use these mail -outs six months prior <br />to an election. <br />Ms. Nicholson said she agreed with Mr. Dill's letter, which stated he did not want the <br />words "irrespective of content" in the opinion. Ms. Malanka agreed. <br />Ms. Lum said she would be okay if they deleted "irrespective of content," as the <br />recommendation would still be that incumbents not send the mail -outs. The Chair agreed to the <br />removal of "irrespective of content." <br />Mr. Ashida reminded the Board that there was no motion on the floor. <br />Motion and vote: Ms. Lum moved for the Board to issue an informal advisory opinion <br />.stating that the mail -outs may constitute a violation of the "Code of Ethics, and to use the wording <br />in Mr. Ashida's letter except for the words "irrespective of content" from point No. 3. Ms. <br />Nicholson seconded the motion. There was no further discussion, and all members present voted <br />aye. <br />The Chair directed the meeting to agenda item "b" under New Business. <br />b. Election of Officers for -2008 (Chair and Vice Chair). <br />The Chair explained that he'd asked the secretary to add this item to the agenda, as it <br />needs to be done at the end of each year. <br />- Motion and vote: Ms. Lum moved to nominate Mr. Joseph as Chair, and Ms. Nicholson <br />seconded the nomination. All members present voted aye. <br />Motion: Ms. Malanka moved to nominate Ms. Lum as Vice Chair. Ms. Nicholson <br />seconded the nomination. <br />Motion: Ms. Lum moved to nominate Mr. Dill as Vice Chair. The Chair said she could <br />not do that without Mr. Dill's permission or approval. <br />Discussion: Ms. Lum said she is comfortable being Vice Chair as long as Chair Joseph <br />is present. She would not like to have to act as Chair if he were not there. The Chair said he had <br />not missed a meeting in the past year. <br />Vote: All members voted aye on Ms. Lum's nomination as Vice Chair. <br />rd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.