My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-01-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2008-01-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:06:22 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ASHIDA: Yes, I —Mary, did you hand out the draft this morning? I prepared a draft <br />informal advisory at the request of the commission, or the Board, last time. When we met <br />last month, the Board had indicated that you wanted to proceed with an informal <br />advisory concerning the mail -outs within the six - month —or that an interpretation of the <br />Board of the current Code of Ethics could be that the mail -outs would be prohibited in a <br />six -month period of time. Yesterday at the Council committee meetings, as you may have <br />read in the newspaper, the ordinance amending the Code pertaining to fines —that passed <br />out of Committee yesterday favorably. The representation made by Mr. Hoffmann <br />yesterday was that a similar bill that he is working on concerning the mail -outs will <br />probably hit the committee later this month in January. Mr. Hookano, is that correct? <br />HOOKANO: Yes, that's correct. <br />ASHIDA: So that being said, these are your options. You could take a look at this draft <br />and proceed with issuing an informal advisory concerning the existing Code, but that's <br />really not advisable at this point, because if the Council is going to go in and actually <br />amend the ordinance —the Code of Ethics —we're going to have new law on it anyway. <br />So this —what I've drafted up may in that event technically be moot or not applicable. So <br />you know, it's up to you how you want to proceed, but at this point I would just wait to <br />see what the Council does. The second committee meetings is this month —I think they're <br />on January 23rd. It's a very notable date in history, by the way. And I would wait to see <br />what they do. You know, you could defer this until next month to see what the Council <br />does, or you can talk about the draft today. It's up to you. <br />CHAIR: With all due respect, I believe that at our last meeting we did issue an informal <br />advisory opinion based on this, and it carried by a majority vote. And we were supposed <br />to have the final communication signed, and are you asking us now to reconsider? <br />ASHIDA: No. I'm saying it's up to you. But all I'm saying is, after January 23rd of this <br />month, and then assume that there are changes made to the Code at the committee <br />meeting on the 23r`' then it will proceed to the full Council's first meeting in February. . <br />And if the Mayor then signs it into law, it changes —this may become moot, because the <br />language of the underlying ordinance will change. <br />CHAIR: I personally would like to just go ahead and move forward with what we have <br />and see what the County Council does in the future. And I think that's what we voted on <br />in our last meeting to begin with. So- <br />ASHIDA: - -That was made at the time, though, that it was not clear whether the Council <br />would move forward with the second of the two initiatives, because I think —Mr. <br />Hookano, you correct me if I'm wrong —but back then, you said that the $500 fine <br />payment would move forward, but at that point not yet the second bill concerning the <br />mail -outs (inaudible). <br />HOOKANO: Well, it was just would depend on their —the drafting and the language, as <br />long as it goes through, you know, the (inaudible) it would go up to committee any way. <br />But just the time line wasn't exactly set. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.