My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-02-13 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2008-02-13 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:06:53 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LUM: Or we vote it down. <br />DILL: Okay. <br />CHAIR: Or we just continue with discussion. Are you going to withdraw your motion, <br />or do you want it to come to a vote? <br />NICHOLSON: I'll be happy to withdraw my motion, if you'll withdraw your second. <br />LUM: I'll withdraw. <br />CHAIR: Okay, then we're back to square one, then. <br />LUM: Now if —would you repeat the wording that you just said about —I can't find it. <br />ASHIDA: You have the resolution -- <br />DILL: - -Yeah, I have it right here. Could I just read it real quickly? <br />LUM: Okay, all right. Yes. <br />DILL: Does the use of County funds for the purpose of purchasing an official County <br />newspaper advertisement that includes the picture of an elected and incumbent County <br />officer constitute a violation of the Code of Ethics? And I think what Ms. Nicholson was <br />trying to accomplish was some positive movement in our discussion, and what I'd like to <br />do is take this wording and offer it as a motion for a vote here. <br />LUM: Well, that's a question you have to —oh, you mean yes or no? <br />DILL: Yes, yeah. <br />LUM: Okay. So that's your motion? The motion is— <br />DILL: - -if we can vote on whether this does —as it's stated in this Communication 2008- <br />19, under be it further resolved that the nature and scope of the inquiry shall be limited to <br />the following question. I would like to offer a motion, a yea or nay vote, to answer this <br />question that states —I don't know if that's allowable. <br />CHAIR: I believe it's allowable. I'll accept your motion, and is there a second? <br />LUM: I'll second. <br />CHAIR: We have a motion and a second- <br />LUM: - -to answer this question— <br />CHAIR: - -and one more time, Mr. Dill - <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.