My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-25 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2008-06-25 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:07:39 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAIR: And Mr. Takai, you also had no special lobbying or anything for Bill 106, just <br />like Mr. Takaba here? <br />TAKAI: No. <br />LUM: And Mr. Takai, you own some rental property? <br />TAKAI: Yes- <br />LUM: That is —that I understand in the affordable —but you've owned the rental <br />property for how long? <br />TAKAI: Since 19 —we bought it vacant in 1990, we built two homes, so since 1991. Yes. <br />LUM: 1991, so that's —wow, that's a long time. <br />CHAIR: And you guys have to conform any way to the County housing department and <br />HUD. The problem 1 think we were discussing is whether —I think we need to be specific in <br />whether the two gentlemen benefited from the violation of the ethics code rather than tying it into <br />the details of this and whether there was a violation. <br />LUM: Okay. I think that the main thing here is the part of our code that I have now <br />buried in all this paper that says nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit an officer from <br />introducing bills and resolutions, serving on committees, or from making statements or taking <br />action in the exercise of the officer's legislative functions. Every officer shall file a full and <br />complete public disclosure. Public disclosure of the nature and extent of the interest or <br />transaction which the officer believes may be affected by the legislative action. Just a comment, <br />I think that most —when you're dealing with some of things in our government, all of us live in <br />the County and we all live in something, most of us are lucky enough to live in something or we <br />have jobs or we have relatives or, you know, we are a community. The people that serve in the <br />County don't really come from outside the County. So that when you're on a board like Tax or <br />Finance that affects property, you're bound to be a renter, or an owner, or a business person. <br />My feeling is from the information that was, the very extensive information from Mr. Takaba and <br />from your very clear letter, it seems that your —all of you disclosed that you had property. There <br />might be a question of whether -- because you were in on this you knew more about the program <br />and could therefore joins the program, but I don't know that that's a big deal. <br />CHAIR: And I think that having these houses built prior- <br />LUM: - -Yeah, in rentals prior. I don't think either person went into rentals after this <br />program came out. Is that correct? You have been renting for a long time? <br />TAKAI: Yes. <br />LUM: I thought that - -I don't know about the rest of the Board, but I thought that the <br />conclusion, I'm looking now on page fifteen of sixteen of Mr. Takaba's response and while the <br />response doesn't necessarily put words in our mouth, I thought that his conclusion: the <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.