Laserfiche WebLink
for. So could you clarify why you brought up this for us, and what the unwarranted <br />privileges or treatments are that you are referring to? <br />JOSEPH.- It went to Mr. Safarik. It's referring to his favoritism of Mr. Safarik in his <br />letter. <br />CHAIR: In his comments about Mr. Safarik in his letter to Hunter Bishop? <br />JOSEPH: Yes. <br />NICHOLSON: If I may, I would reiterate I just didn't see that what Mr. Ashida had said <br />in his email in fact was in any way favoring one candidate over another. I think it was <br />just clarifying some facts. <br />L UM: I agree. <br />GENTRY.- Then I would move that the Board find no violation of Section —HCC Section <br />2 -83. <br />NICHOLSON: I'll second it. <br />CHAIR: Discussion? Arthur, you got anything? Want to make sure you're still apart. <br />MARTIN: I'm right here. I've got to say this, though. This is only my second meeting, <br />being on this Board. I got all this at the first meeting. That means it all happened before <br />I even knew what was going on. So I'm just having difficulty assimilating. <br />CHAIR: Any other discussion before we vote? All in favor of the motion? <br />GENTRY, NICHOLSON, L UM, MARTIN (simultaneously): Aye. <br />CHAIR: Aye. Okay. <br />ASHIDA: Thank you. <br />CHAIR: All right, thank you very much. <br />L UM.• Thank you, Mr. Ashida and Mr. Joseph. <br />Everyone but the Board members and staff left the room. It was 11:15 a.m. <br />CHAIR: Moving on with the agenda. <br />HEEL Sorry, before we move on, just to clarify if the Board per the rules wants to <br />issue a written informal advisory opinion to both petitioner and respondent— <br />CHAIR: - -We do. <br />27 <br />