My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-03-11 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2009-03-11 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:09:05 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:57:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MARTIN: That's nay problem with this, because it seems like it all hinges on the use of <br />one word- <br />LUM: - -And is this something that— <br />MARTIN: - -and it's a word that —those are the kind of words that —it's one of those kind <br />of words that we all people that we're sort of against would use anyway. Probably <br />we've all used them. But what's so wrong about it? I don't understand. <br />LUM: Yeah, I've read —we're not acting on it now, but I think that I'm in agreement <br />there, that – <br />GENTRY: Well, if we look at the copy that he sent us, September 30' ", the first <br />paragraph could be seen as a slur against Mr. Cole. Everything else, I tell you- <br />LUM: - -Wait, where are you looking? <br />GENTRY- This one here. Now, I consider myself to be educated enough to read this <br />stuff. I started reading it, and my eyes went crossed. And it's nothing against him, I <br />understand where he's coming from. But I feel everything after the first paragraph is like <br />totally irrelevant. So if he wants to focus on the incident and what led up to the incident, <br />then that should be formally put into a petition, point by point. <br />LUM: That's what we asked him to do before. <br />GENTRY- Yeah, and he has —so in my eyes —he has failed to do that. So one paragraph <br />out of what —two pages probably meets the criteria out of this particular document. So I <br />don't think he's the kind of person, and I don't know him personally, but I don't think <br />he's the kind of person that's going to let-this one go. He might come after us and say <br />that we failed to do our duty, and quote us another three and a half pages. <br />LUM: Well, I think that we can just put it very succinctly, what we do. If we do not take <br />action, that we —if we were to decide not to take action on it, that it could be just clear - <br />cut, that we decline to take action in the matter, and – <br />GENTRY. Well, I'll make a —I would make a motion, then. I move that we reply to Mr. <br />Cole, saying that the Board has reviewed his documents and will not take action on this <br />matter because he hasn't supplied us with enough information. <br />LUM: Well, is that true — enough information? Oh, we have to have —wait, before we <br />can discuss —do we have a second, before we can discuss? <br />MARTIN: I'll second. <br />LUM: Okay. Do we want more information, or do we really think <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.