Laserfiche WebLink
L UM: Yes. <br />COLE 1 wish to point out that my purpose of filing the petition of the ethics department <br />here was to bring forth evidence of organized government corruption that extorts and <br />threatens Emily Naeole and has resulted in her selling her vote. I also wish to point out <br />in caveat this time that as this body has the authority of law, I am bringing forth this <br />information in accordance with Criminal Title 18, United States Code, Part I, Chapter 1, <br />misprision offelony. The documentation contained in this petition constitutes a citizen's <br />obligation under the United States Code. It is noted that the counsel for the Ethics Board <br />is in conflict of interest, as the stipulations in the petition state that agents of the County <br />and State of Hawai `i have threatened and intimidated me in order to prevent my bringing <br />forth evidence of organized government corruption. This stipulation is not contested or <br />protested by the County of Hawai `i in the federal court. Therefore, in accordance with <br />the oath ofyour office, you are obligated to take action as duly required by law in this <br />matter, irregardless of anything else in this committee. I would also like to point out that <br />my appearance here is to prevent the probable damage, death and injury of citizens of the <br />people of Hawai `i resulting from the corruption of organized government individuals <br />here in an enterprise or racketeering activity that altered the stream beds and elevations <br />in the streams of Hawai `i resulting in the flooding of February 2008. In addition, I'd <br />also like to point out that currently the Corporation Counsel of the County of Hawai `i <br />has filed criminal charges against me for bringing forth evidence of organized <br />corruption, of which apparently he is a member. The documents placed in this statement, <br />and the documents (indecipherable) before you will show organized government <br />corruption. Emily Naeole's refusal to represent me was based on the fact that I came to <br />her because I have been threatened and intimidated, and my family was threatened by the <br />County Police Department and the Prosecuting Attorney. This is a court document of the <br />impeachment proceedings against Emily Naeole, and the documents is the evidence that <br />in retaliation for my bringing forth evidence of corruption in the federal court, Chief <br />Mahuna, Prosecuting Attorney Kimura, and others did conspire to threaten and <br />intimidate me and retaliate against me by issuing my, father a ticket for an accident he did <br />not participate in, and corruptly persuaded and led perjury before the court. Judges <br />Metcalf, Smith, are complacent and participating in retaliation in violation offederal <br />code, in specific Title 18, United States Code, 1512, retali —and 1513, retaliation against <br />a witness, victim, or informant, and threatening or intimidating a victim, witness, or <br />informant. <br />L UM: Mr. Cole— <br />COLE: Yes? <br />L UM: Time is about up. <br />COLE: I wish to request extension of this council due to the mitigating circumstances <br />here. <br />LUM.- Let me just say we're a County Board ofEthics. <br />2 <br />