Laserfiche WebLink
addition, the fact that Lincoln has also stated in a signed document he had no knowledge <br />and offers a 28 August letter which is duplicate which is the draft letter of the 7 June <br />2000 means that there was a connection. The conflict of interest comes and the thing is <br />that should this action be taken against him, he would suffer monetary loss greatly in <br />defending his action, so he is actually preserving property of himself, which is a conflict <br />of interest and use of his official position. <br />CHAIR: Okay, I understand where you're coming from. Go ahead, Ms. Gentry? <br />GENTRY: Yeah, I have a simple question that might help a little bit. With regard <br />attached to your petition is the Police Department letter dated June 7. <br />COLE: Um hmm. <br />GENTRY: Did you receive this letter in the mail? <br />COLE: Yes, I was sent that letter by the Police Chief. <br />GENTRY: Did you retain the envelope with the postmark on it? <br />COLE: Yes, I believe I do, yes. <br />GENTRY: Okay, what was that postmark date? <br />COLE: I believe it was just before June 7th I'm not sure actually, I would have to get <br />the postmark letter. <br />GENTRY: Okay. <br />COLE: However, the documents ofJune the 7th letter and the identity of the June the 7th <br />letter is in numerous court documents and other correspondence, so its presence was <br />recognized long before August the 28`h <br />CHAIR: In other bodies, in other agencies. <br />COLE: Yes. <br />GENTRY: I was just wondering when you received it. <br />COLE: I received it before August the 28`h <br />GENTRY: Okay. <br />CHAIR: Okay? Thank you, Mr. Cole. Mr. Ashida, you have any other comments? <br />ASHIDA: No, thank you. <br />