Laserfiche WebLink
could come up later that could not be foreseen in less time. Ms. Nicholson recollected that Maui <br />County was considering a one- to two -year limit. Ms. Lum said her impression is that some <br />petitions are filed because of cumulative behavior, where an action becomes the last straw for the <br />petitioner. Ms. Nicholson said the time limit is not really an issue, and they always ask a late <br />petitioner why it took so long. <br />The Board decided to leave the matter alone. <br />Ms. Nicholson brought up her December 6, 2009, email to Ms. Schoen, asking questions <br />about the Ethics Code, and Ms. Schoen's responses. Question 8 dealt with lobbyist registration, <br />and whether blogs or other electronic media which did not exist when the Code was drafted <br />should be added to the list of media in Section 2- 91.3(b)(5)(D). The other members agreed. <br />Ms. Nicholson also brought up Section 2- 91.3(e)(1), which states that lobbyist statements <br />and forms need to be filed with the County Clerk by United States mail. Filing of such forms <br />should also be allowed by hand - delivery, as well as by more modern methods such as email and <br />fax. <br />The Board discussed how proof of filing would be shown, as it might not be possible to <br />get a delivery receipt when emailing. Ms. Lum suggested language to say that the forms could <br />also be delivered by hand or electronically with proof of receipt, and the others agreed. <br />Ms. Schoen said the Board at an earlier meeting had discussed refining Section 2- 83(a)(3) <br />of the Code, which required that all officers /employees treat persons in a "courteous, fair and <br />impartial manner." <br />The Board discussed whether they should tighten up the section, as "courteous, fair and <br />impartial" means different things to different people. Ms. Lum said that though the section was <br />inconvenient to the Board did not mean it should not be a part of the Code and that citizens <br />perhaps needed a "catch -all" bucket to bring up their frustrations. <br />The Board decided to leave the section alone. <br />The Chair instructed the members to let Ms. Schoen or the secretary know if they thought <br />of any other proposals, and he would work with Ms. Schoen on drafting the response to the <br />Mayor. <br />Ms. Lum reminded them to mention in the response the certification form for contracts <br />and the electronic service of lobbyist documents. <br />Ms. Nicholson said they could request the Mayor share their concerns in his submittal to <br />the Council, and the Chair said they would include that in their response. <br />The Chair called for a recess at 11:20 a.m. <br />The Chair called the meeting back to order at 11:24 a.m. <br />7 <br />