My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-14 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2010-07-14 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:11:38 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:57:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
document and has stated that this is a criminal act. It is a title based on fraudulent <br />conveyance, and so that the County of Hawai `i has to make Title Guaranty actually go <br />back to the inception of title, and that they're not reflecting that in their title report to the <br />mayor, or to any of the county council members. The protection of the interest and the <br />survival of the kanaka - -we claim misrepresentation and illegal land transfer. It is <br />unlawful to sell stolen property. There's a probate law violation. No consideration for <br />the probate of Naukana and Keah `iheleikamoku (spelling uncertain) in Hamakua and the <br />interests of the 245 chiefs are mentioned in the title search. There 's an international law <br />violation that under UNESCO, relating to HRS 7 -1, there is a bill 2895 that was signed <br />into law by the governor on May of 2000 which prohibits the sale and transfer of cultural <br />property, which is allodial title, which is also mentioned in Title Guaranty's HRS 7 -5 <br />corporate training packet. So even though they denied on camera dealing with allodial <br />title lands or having knowledge of this type of land, it's in their corporate training <br />packet, it's mentioned in HRS 7 -1, and it's actually part of the Bill 2895 that was signed <br />into law, which also would bind the county so far as non - transference of cultural <br />property. The title search is incomplete. We're stating thatyou do have time to make <br />Title Guaranty to do the proper search, but apparently they will not do the search <br />because they refuse to reflect on any political or historical anything political or <br />historical in the report. Now part of the reason we feel that may be is because William <br />Kenney, the founding father of Title Guaranty, is also the plena potentiary for the illegal <br />treaty of cession. So it's actually a conflict of interest for Title Guaranty to keep <br />presiding over any title search in Hawai `i. And so what we're saying is that herewith <br />Title Guaranty, it shows in their corporate training packet that they were formed in 1896 <br />And you'll notice on the document of Queen Lili `uokalani, the altered document, her <br />name is crossed out and the date on it is 1896 And President Dole [sic] has signed his <br />name over it. Now I do have on the board a statement from President Cleveland <br />commanding Dole to restore the queen to her position, and Dole refused, and thereby the <br />overthrow in 1893. Then in 1896 they systematically took the queen's land, crossed out <br />the titles. And I need to remind you again that even the Consumer Protection Agency, <br />when referred to about this document, said that they would have to refer it to criminal <br />real estate investigation. So the county is basically in possession of stolen property, <br />forensically related to the overthrow. So how are you going to ethically deal with this <br />situation? The problem is, too, is that Title Guaranty still continues to deny the <br />knowledge of the altered document, even though it came from their files, and we have it <br />on record Ken of Department of Finance talking to Colleen Uahinui, who is the title <br />officer for Title Guaranty, and she simply turns her head and denies that that came from <br />her file, even though Ken of Department of Finance is stating that yes, it did come from <br />her file. They also refused to report on the time period from 1893 to 1896 when the <br />queen's name is crossed out. The title officer stated she does not have to red flag the <br />altered document for the mayor, thereby putting the mayor in an unethical position. <br />There's no report of a criminal act inside of their title report. Also, we are also stating <br />that it is abhorrent that on that title you also know that God's name is crossed out, along <br />with the queen's. So we're saying that under King Kamehameha III, that he placed all <br />the lands under the Kingdom of God, and the Hamakua land theft amounts not only to <br />stolen property of Queen Lili `uokalani, her heirs and successors, the native Hawaiian <br />Kanaka, and all of Hawaiian nationals, but is also stolen property of God, because the <br />Kanaka tie their religion to the land, and the land theft and displacement of Hawaiians <br />from their `diva is a form of religious persecution, genocide by removal of original <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.