My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-13 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2010-10-13 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:12:10 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:57:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
happened as well. So that is something I did not add to my addendum, because I did not <br />want this staff member to experience the barrage of questions and undergo the heat that <br />I've undergone by bringing this forward. In addition, I have proof of the allegations that <br />I made that for Facebook, Ms. Naeole at a campaign committee meeting gave me a set of <br />pictures that she wanted me to post on her Facebook, and I agreed to do it when I got <br />home. I didn't realize at the time, but I did not know any of the people in the pictures. So <br />the next morning I contacted her to ask her to meet with me in town so that I could get the <br />names of the people for the captions on the pictures, and she referred me to her <br />secretary, Ms. Kupahu. And I said okay, but this is campaign stuff, and so she said <br />please just email her secretary. So I had to call the office to get the email address, and I <br />got it, and I have the proof of that email right here, my solicitation for the names and Ms. <br />Kupahu's response from the county's email to that. And this was nothing but campaign <br />business, and it happened from the office via the computer. That is the premise. There <br />are other things that other people know that could come forward to verify other things <br />that happened in the office. Obviously they're not comfortable doing that, because <br />they're employed or they're in the office working. But this is what I know, right here. <br />And this is the proof that I have. <br />CHAIR: Okay. Thank you, Ms. Robert. Again, we 're just doing an initial review now to <br />see if the Board would like to take this to the next step, which would be holding an <br />informal hearing. Board members, questions? <br />LUM: I have a question. You mentioned a brochure. Do you know where or when those <br />corrections, those labels, were do you know anything about what is that part of this, <br />where those corrections were done? Or it's just <br />ROBERT: - -Some of them were done in the office. I wasn't present, I didn't see this, <br />but <br />UM - -So you don't really do you know ? <br />ROBERT: Well, the person that was doing the corrections told me who was working on <br />them, and she works in the office. <br />L UM: Now, is she a volunteer? <br />ROBERT: Yes. Yes, she is, but the secretary was also working on them, and she's not a <br />volunteer. And then she brought them home and finished them at home. But they were <br />started in the office. <br />CHAIR: The Board members, questions? <br />HEAUKULANI: Mr. Chairman? <br />CHAIR: Yes, sir? <br />HEAUKULANI: I move that we take this to the next level, which is informal hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.