Laserfiche WebLink
multiple holdings in real estate, and the alteration of the FEMA flood insurance rate <br />maps would dramatically affect their development, in particular the Kahaopea Gardens <br />development. Therefore, the actions of the OIP director, in conspiracy with members of <br />the Corporation Counsel, to include Lincoln Ashida and others, is conspired to deprive a <br />person of their rights to petition the government and redress a grievance, and is a <br />conspiracy against rights to suppress as evidence. This being said, the County is <br />bankrupt. The information I've presented before you will be presented in the United <br />States District Court, District of Columbia, within 30 days. These documents are <br />contained here. In addition, the information that's contained in here will be sent to the <br />Securities and Exchange Commission and to Moody's Rating, Standard and Poor's <br />Rating, and Fitz Rating. The State Attorney General, Mark Bennett, who was requested <br />by Corporation Counsel Lincoln Ashida in June of 2004 to investigate environmental <br />violations, is a partner in the law firm of McCorriston and a number of others. That law <br />firm is the bond counsel to the County of Hawai `i, and therefore Mark Bennett knew, or <br />should have known, that such an action of civil and criminal liability would place a risk <br />for the offering of general obligation bonds by the County. That information alone, just <br />that information, is sufficient to create in the investigations that the FCC has now <br />entertained against the County of Hawai `i. In addition, you will see I have filed a <br />petition against Finance Director Nancy Crawford. It appears the County of Hawai `i is <br />offering bond anticipation notes solely to the Bank of Hawai `i. The County of Hawai `i is <br />paying 1.8 percent to 1.2 percent on these short -term notes. At the same time, the County <br />of Hawai `i has over $44 million on deposit with the Bank of Hawai `i getting one -tenth <br />the interest. The County of Hawai `i has had $22 million on an account for years drawing <br />$18, 000 a year interest on $22 million. The County any attempt by the County to float a <br />bond as in Bill 311 will result in my testifying and presenting this evidence to the FCC <br />and the bond raters. Should the County not divulge it themselves, the County bond rating <br />will go to a D rating, basically worthless. That will increase the interest rates. I bring <br />before you a pattern and history of these activities, and by law your only requirement is <br />to go to the State Attorney General's Office and request an investigation, as stated by the <br />Hawai `i County Police Department when they refused to allow me to file a complaint of <br />extortion against Lincoln Ashida, Jay Kimura, and a number of other ones, including Mr. <br />Dill here. The fact that you're not allowed to file a complaint is a violation and <br />deprivation of rights, a conspiracy of deprivation of rights. These are federal laws. <br />These are serious laws. The actions that we're talking about bond fraud, that's 30 <br />years and a million dollar fine. Altering of Hilo streams in emergency benefits, that's 30 <br />years. When you add racketeering to this now, you triple all of those. So we have a <br />racketeering enterprise. If you follow the history that I have here you have a short <br />number of people who are related the Takases, then you have the corporate counsel <br />members, county council members they're a very small group of people that all started <br />together. And they've been floating around the county and controlling every aspect of <br />the county. So I the only option that I see, and basically that I will accept, is that this <br />Board move and refer the entire matter to the State Attorney General and to the United <br />States Justice Department, Criminal Division, Public Integrity Section. The documents <br />and the addresses you will find are on the back pages of your light reading there. But it's <br />still a situation that why am I before this Board, when we had secret letters of extortion <br />sent to the Board. We had five attorneys sitting in the room, and nobody made an <br />exception that secret letters were used in order to make a determination? If secret letters <br />were sent out on you, and you lost a house, or secret letters sent to a court, and a <br />I <br />