Laserfiche WebLink
BALSIS: - -and so therefore I have to wait until we have a majority before we act on the <br />petitions. <br />SCHOEN: Correct. <br />BALSIS: So at this point in time I think we should move along to the next agenda, and I <br />can refer this back to the Chairman for the next agenda item. <br />SCHOEN: That's correct. <br />BALSIS: Mr. Chair? <br />DILL: Thank you, Mr. Balsis. <br />Ms. Schoen suggested that the Board take an item out of order and move next to agenda <br />item 5a, as it would be brief since the Board did not have a quorum to hear it, and they could <br />release the petitioner, who was present. <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Petition No. 2010 -11: Further initial review of petition questioning whether an <br />officer had a conflict of interest when voting on Bill 283, and whether statements <br />made by the officer caused the officer to violate financial disclosure requirements. <br />DILL: Thanks for coming back, Mr. Cadaoas. As you remember from last time, we <br />didn't have a full majority vote on your petition. <br />CADAOAS: Yes. <br />DILL: Unfortunately, Mr. Balsis had recused himself and Mr. Henricks is not here <br />today, who is also our remaining member on the quorum, for us to make a decision on it <br />today. We didn 't find out he wasn't going to come until yesterday. <br />CADAOAS: All right. <br />DILL: So that leaves us in a similar situation where we only have two voting members <br />remaining for today only, which means we'll have to take up your petition again next <br />month, when Mr. Henricks can be apart of this meeting, and then formulate the quorum <br />of three people. <br />CADAOAS: Okay. <br />DILL: So I apologize for the inconvenience. Do we need I guess we can't even vote on <br />it, to continue it, but we will agendize it under Unfinished Business for the March <br />meeting. And then Mary will get a hold of you if there's any change in terms of who will <br />attend or who won't, okay? <br />9 <br />