My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-04 Windward Planning Commission Hearing Transcript
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-05-04 Windward Planning Commission Hearing Transcript
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 9:39:11 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 9:39:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hit the entire island regardless of whether you were next to the coast or not. And so we want a <br />system that is island wide and takes care of all kinds of contingencies. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you. Any other questions from staff? Seeing none, would you like to add <br />anything else, Madam Director? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: No. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay, then for the record nobody signed up from the public to testify. <br /> <br />ONO: I -. <br /> <br />KERN: Commissioner Ono. <br /> <br />ONO: I’m sorry, I’m just thinking off the top of my head. You know, when we make these <br />recommendations, my concern is, are we looking at where the funding is going to be coming <br />from? <br /> <br />KERN: I can answer or you can answer. This one is built in. That is it is basically the <br />developer’s responsibility or kuleana to build it. If they are going to do a subdivision of 25 lots or <br />more, they have to put in an alert system in there. If they’re doing a commercial building of <br />certain size or more or mixed use, then it triggers that. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: There is a plan for the State to provide funding for a number of sirens, and <br />we are going to be implementing that, and there are a number of critical areas first. The concern <br />is that if someone wants to kind of get ahead of the State putting these sirens in and thereby <br />increase the density in an area, the traffic in an area, and thereby increase the need to evacuate <br />people, that if they want to go ahead and build before the State builds the siren, then they need to <br />put the siren in first when they get to a certain density. That’s basically -. Otherwise, they need <br />to wait for the State to come in and build it. <br /> <br />ONO: One more question. <br /> <br />KERN: Yes, go ahead, Commissioner Ono. <br /> <br />ONO: Daryn mentioned the thing about these resort areas. Are they grandfathered to be excused <br />or will they have to put in one of these siren things? <br /> <br />ARAI: Well, the way I see it, there is no such thing as grandfather. I mean it’s a matter of <br />providing these types of needed warning systems in place to address existing development. The <br />reason for concurrency is basically before any additional development is approved, making <br />matters worse, that these types of minimum standards or minimum facilities are provided in the <br />area, no different than road, no different than water. Those facilities must be in place to provide <br />adequate support as development commences, pursues. So -. <br /> <br />3 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.