My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Report of the Cost of Government Commission 2010-2011
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Reports
>
Report of the Cost of Government Commission 2010-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 10:25:58 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 10:12:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> B. Process and Procedures Followed by the COGC <br /> Early on, reviewing the prior Cost of Government reports issued in 2003 and 2007, and in <br /> discussion with current County employees, COGC members felt some concern about the <br /> commitment of County government to take its recommendation seriously. However, given the <br /> challenging environment, especially the fiscal restraints that the County now faces, it is hoped <br /> that the recommendations included in this report will receive a careful and thoughtful reading by <br /> the Mayor, members of the County Council, and the heads of all County departments. <br /> The COGC, which held 18 meetings over the course of eleven months to formulate this report, <br /> utilized a number of methods in its research. Surveys were developed and sent to all County <br /> employees. Departmental inquiries that focused on specific questions as well as requests for <br /> updated responses on actions recommended in previous COGC reports were also solicited. <br /> Interviews were conducted with various County employees, including Department heads and/or <br /> their designated representatives, employees, administrative and support staff, and affiliated <br /> members of the public. Various County documents and focused internet research were also <br /> helpful in formulating the basis for some of the interview questions as well as in preparing this <br /> report. Due to time constraints public input, although welcomed, was not directly solicited. <br /> Summary COGC Efforts: I <br /> Theme: <br /> Identify What Services the County is Responsible to Provide <br /> Overarching Policy Issues: <br /> Contracting Process Collection & Fees County Technology Plan <br /> Invited Department Heads, Corporation Counsel, and personnel who deal with these <br /> processes and procedures to speak with COGC <br /> Focus Areas (3 Subcommittees) <br /> Operations/Budget Revenue Enhancement Technology Adoption <br /> Recommendations and Collections <br /> and Consolidation <br /> • Analyzed Responses to Questionnaires and Conducted Interviews with Departments <br /> and Personnel <br /> r <br /> Actions Taken by Commission: <br /> • Provided a Questionnaire to County Agencies, Departments and Commissions via Letter <br /> Provided a Questionnaire to County Employees via Payroll Notice <br /> ,I • Logged and Categorized Responses to Questionnaires <br /> • Received Presentation from County Green Team <br /> • Analyzed Responses Regarding the Implementation Status &Adoption of 2007 COGC <br /> Recommendations <br /> i • Requested and Received Results from an Employee Survey that Dominic Yagong <br /> conducted in the Spring of 2009 <br /> • Received Presentations and Conducted Q&A with Specific Departments and County <br /> Administration Offices including a member from the Council and the Mayor <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.