My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-14 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes (Hilo Mtg)
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2006
>
2006-08-14 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes (Hilo Mtg)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 2:01:25 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 1:59:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
handle it like a resort would such as Mauna Kea Beach Hotel; when the parking lot is <br />full, they have a gate and a person stopping people from going in. <br />Commissioner Yung asked if turning in from the Hamakua side is dangerous and <br />it's owned by County, what happens? <br />Mr. Yuen stated if they say this place is a County beach access, they would need <br />to have a safe turnaround. They need to keep in mind public safety even if they are <br />talking about a low level facility. <br />Mr. Yuen moved onto Mahukona. In referring to the maps that he brought, he <br />marked Akoni Pule Highway, Lakapaki Park which is State owned, a light house on <br />Federal property and another small property which is State owned. Mr. Yuen stated most <br />of the area right around and north of Mahukona Harbor is owned by Surety. They have <br />the zoning for a small resort. The area north of the bay is one acre zoning. The zoning <br />has a number of conditions requiring public access. Mr. Yuen asked if this was another <br />example of wanting to purchase property to prevent development or to purchase property <br />to expand. Mr. Yuen stated there was a small County park there. <br />Commissioner Flores stated there were couple reasons why. One was to expand <br />the County's facility in the area because of the existing County Park which is really small <br />and possibly expanding camping in that area. The other was the protection of sites in the <br />area. Commissioner Flores stated it came up because perhaps there may be a time where <br />the entitlements could be bought out from them. There are major cultural sites makai of <br />the road. <br />Mr. Yuen stated this was a question again as to how much do you work with the <br />land use controls versus acquisition. There will always be a limited amount of money <br />when working with acquisition. Mr. Yuen clarified that the Commission partially desired <br />to not see development, partially to expand the County Park and partially to protect the <br />historic sites. <br />Chair Replogle stated he heard from the Kohala people that they wanted to see <br />their coast line protected and not developed. He stated that the task force in Ka`u was <br />finishing up making recommendations and decided to go for a mile and a half set back, <br />which he felt was a little unreasonable but on the other side of that maybe some 500 <br />meters or more; just no building on the coast ever, that could be accomplished with <br />zoning. <br />Mr. Yuen replied setbacks depended on the terrain. There are places where it's <br />more open. There are places where you can build houses a few hundred feet away from <br />the beach and the public would never see them and there are other places where it would <br />stick out. If you lock into a set distance or concept, it may not fit everyplace. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.