Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Garovoy stated she wondered about the fact that in (c) there's a strike through at (c) <br />(1) however there was no section (d) with an entire strike through; things like that she felt <br />could be interpreted in a number of ways. Ms. Garovoy stated what would be helpful for <br />Debbie and her group was if the County could share the legal authority or the case law <br />they used to give them a level playing field where they could share the case law with an <br />attorney (if they get one.) <br />Ms. Self stated that this was not a deliberate attempt to try and knock this down. <br />Ms. Hecht stated she thought it was a little suspect that it was brought up a week before <br />the ballot language was due, which was September 8, 2006. Ms. Hecht stated on Friday, <br />at 4:30 p.m. which was the day that the ballot question was due from the County, this was <br />the first they ever saw of the language deleting 214 -D. Ms. Hecht stated the other part <br />that was deleted on the ballot question and submitted on the deadline day was the part <br />where it stated, "If you agree, vote for. If you disagree, vote against." What also was <br />deleted was, "(Notice: A ballot left "blank" on this question will not be counted as a <br />"FOR" or "AGAINST" or a "ballot cast ".)" Ms. Hecht stated it was like a shifting <br />landscape. She also stated she had a naive notion that elected officials represent their <br />constituents and help enable the will of the people and somewhere along the line, almost <br />ten thousand people signing a petition was a pretty good indicator that's what people <br />want to happen. Ms. Hecht stated she figured it out it was 12.7% of all registered voters <br />in the County signed their petitions. <br />Ms. Self stated she makes no representation for the Council and she doesn't represent <br />them in this situation but she could say that no one in the Corporation Counsel office did <br />anything deliberately. She was not sure what Connie told Ms. Hecht but legal <br />interpretation was made by Lincoln Ashida, who spent an entire weekend researching <br />this, and she's not sure about the timing issues or even when the deadlines were, but she <br />does know that Lincoln was quite shocked that the section had been left out and that was <br />the way it was submitted. Ms. Self stated that Ms. Hecht's suggestion of talking to the <br />council members was a great idea. She stated she's not sure which ones were in favor <br />and which ones weren't but she thought a lot of them were probably in favor of <br />purchasing lands that this Commission has chosen and selected. <br />Ms. Hecht stated the Council voted unanimously to override Connie Kiriu to give them <br />certificate of sufficiency after she invalidated so many signatures for ridiculous reasons. <br />She thought there was a fair amount of support from the Council for it. <br />Ms. Self stated she couldn't speak on their behalf but she thought they were going to feel <br />the same way about how this turned out. <br />Ms. Hecht asked if the Council could override a ballot question. <br />Ms. Self stated she didn't think they could override it. <br />in <br />