My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-11 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2006
>
2006-12-11 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 2:02:05 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 1:59:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
no matter what property they are looking at. Mr. Yada stated whether that should be used <br />for ranking, it's was hard to say. It's a case by case basis. <br />Ms. Springer stated her concern would be that the properties not be competitive with each <br />other for funding. Ms. Springer stated the Commission's task was to generate a list and <br />prioritize it and then be protective of that. Ms. Springer wondered if they should <br />articulate in their report some sort of reference to the non - political merits of the <br />properties. <br />Ms. Self stated maybe the Commission could indicate in their report how they feel the <br />process should go through. The Council wants guidance in that. Ms. Self stated if the <br />Commission gave the Council some feedback, they would be appreciative. <br />Ms. Springer asked if it should it go in the report or as a letter attached to report. <br />Mr. Yada suggested in report. Mr. Yada stated an example of having a property that was <br />12 million dollars and based on the funding, it would take 4 or 5 years to build up the <br />monies for purchase. Even though it may be first on the list, it would take longer to <br />purchase. You may have to pursue different types of funding and set aside a certain <br />amount of funding. <br />Mr. Campbell stated it was his understanding that funding should be looked at no matter <br />what. <br />Mr. Yada stated when it's a large number, its hard for the County to do it alone. <br />Ms. Garovoy stated that Maui County has 1% set aside for property taxes, the way they <br />do it is through a grant process where some entity proposes to the County that the money <br />from their Public Access Open Space Fund becomes available for a certain property. Ms. <br />Garovoy stated she was sure one of the components of the grant application was probably <br />whether or not they had matching funds from other sources. <br />Mr. Gilmartin stated if the Commission gets the reputation of going to properties that <br />were for sale, that person could basically jack up the prices. <br />Mr. Flores stated it wouldn't shift the ranking because it would've been already assessed. <br />Mr. Flores stated in the ranking process, it got certain points because of the overall <br />components. If you follow the assessment scoring, it would place the property where it <br />should be with regards to ranking. Mr. Flores stated with regards to educating the <br />Council, maybe having the Chair do a briefing with the Mayor, his staff and the Council <br />when the list comes out would be helpful. <br />Ms. Self stated with Council, they wouldn't all be able to meet unless it's on the agenda. <br />Mr. Yada asked if the Mayor's list gets agendized because that would be a good time for <br />that. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.