My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-06-12 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes (Hilo Mtg)
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2007
>
2007-06-12 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes (Hilo Mtg)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 2:02:40 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 1:59:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Flores stated he thought they also had a problem when the initial resolution went <br />forth because there were wrong TMK's presented. Mr. Flores stated he thought it had <br />included some of the private owner parcels. <br />Mr. Yada stated prior to these hearings he met with Councilman Jacobson to clarify and <br />correct some of the TMK's. <br />Ms. Springer stated when they receive the suggestion forms but there is no clarity as to <br />where the line should be drawn, how does this Commission get clarity when it comes <br />time to do their recommendation? <br />Mr. Yada suggested when the Commission enters a recommendation of priorities, if there <br />is a reference to TMK's, they shouldn't use only a certain portion. The Commission may <br />need to be clearer because it leaves it open for interpretation; someone may say it's the <br />whole TMK. <br />Ms. Springer asked if there is a TMK that is a large amount of acreage, should this <br />Commission only suggest the SMA portion of it. Would that be sufficient? <br />Mr. Yada replied that he doesn't think that it has to be tied to the SMA, but there should <br />be something referencing it, i.e. distance. <br />Mr. Flores asked if they would have to subdivide. It is possible to purchase only a <br />portion of a TMK. <br />Mr. Yada stated when a conservation easement is acquired, there is no need to subdivide. <br />It would depend on what is being done. Mr. Yada stated if it were to be acquired, then it <br />would need to be subdivided. <br />Ms. Garcia responded that they would have to take on an individual basis. <br />Ms. Springer asked Mr. Yada if that was the job of this Commission. <br />Mr. Yada stated the job of this Commission is to come up with the recommended <br />priorities. Mr. Yada stated the lesson in this is to be more specific, especially when <br />dealing with portions of larger parcels. <br />Ms. Schuster stated the Commission should be careful about how they make decisions on <br />how far inland, because of cultural resource sites. She would be open to having that <br />boundary surveyed to determine what would be appropriate for that particular area. Ms. <br />Schuster stated it would be hard to have a flexible boundary but it would be more <br />appropriate. <br />Ms. Springer asked Ms. Schuster how her recommendation would be implemented. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.