2008-07-14 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes

Home

• Continue discussion of procedure regarding process for creating the priority list Ms. Springer asked Ms. Self to recap how the LLF processes their grant applications. Ms. Self replied that the applications are received and as they review what is submitted, each member puts it in the order they think it should be. Then subjectively, they discuss why they think one should be higher than the other. After discussion, they will vote and determine their "top" properties. Ms. Springer noted that the numerical scoring system was used in the beginning due to the amount of suggestion forms that was submitted, however since there's much less forms now they can look at a different approach. Mr. Flores added that the assessment criteria form was just for initial screening purposes. When the "Top 5 or 10" were determined then the properties could be looked at in more detail, the only problem was that they didn't have enough time. Mr. Komata then asked if they will be evaluating the forms using the new system. Ms. Springer replied that they have the tools to do that and since they have more time this year, they can score the properties numerically first and then in October have an open discussion. Mr. Flores noted that no solicitation was sent out this year to the public due to the lack of funding, however a few were still submitted. Ms. Springer stressed her discomfort over the fact that forms continue to still come in and the suggestion form indicates that it will be considered the following year. Ms. Self commented that the forms should still be considered and maybe the Commission can also look at the list of properties that have resolutions passed. She added that eight properties have approved resolutions; which now gives the administration the authority to purchase. Mr. Campbell mentioned that three properties still don't have resolutions (Mahukona, Kukuipahu- Hd'ena and `O`oma II). Ms. Garcia commented that once there's a resolution, it's out of the Commission's hands. She also suggested that they could even prioritize the approved resolutions. Ms. Self then suggested that the Council adopt this list as their priority. Mr. Komata suggested that they incorporate all properties in one list to create a whole new picture since he doesn't feel that it's right to remove any properties regardless of the scoring. Ms. Springer noted that the 2008 comprehensive list will include all properties from 2007 along with the forms that were submitted this year. The 2008 prioritized list will contain the properties which were the subject of resolutions; however it may or may not be limited. Mr. Flores commented that they are helping to facilitate the goal of acquisition of lands. Once the purchase of Kawa`a is completed, this list of prioritized resolutions may be able to help the County administration.