My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-08-11 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2008
>
2008-08-11 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 2:03:50 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 2:00:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
problem with that is, if they go back to that concept of carrying the list from year to year, <br />it's hard to reconcile the scoring process and the concept of maintaining the list. <br />Ms. Springer asked if the Council ever responded to Mayor Kim's February 25, 2008 <br />letter to the Council, requesting direction from the Council in the prioritization as to the <br />rest of the parcels. <br />Mr. Yada replied that it was discussed and the response was that they didn't see the need <br />to do it. <br />Mr. Flores stated with the 3 reports this Commission has done, they ended up with lists <br />based upon the scoring process. With the last report, the idea was to just use the scoring <br />as a filtering of all the applicants however, they ran out of time. Mr. Flores stated the <br />Commission never did the second part of looking at the top score in detail. Also, they <br />didn't look at the properties the County Council made resolutions on. The Commission <br />thought that was already being taken cared of. Mr. Flores stated in the most recent <br />discussions, the Commission was not going to actively solicit suggestion forms. They <br />were going to look at the properties that had resolutions on and prioritize that. That <br />might help facilitate the process of acquisition. <br />Mr. Gilmartin stated he's opposed to the action that the Council took in terms of <br />resolutions. That was the responsibility of the Commission. Mr. Gilmartin stated if the <br />Council wanted to purchase something that's on this Commission's list or not, that's up <br />to them. For this Commission, we have a process. The Council should be looking to us <br />for guidance. <br />Mr. Yada stated the County was legally authorized to purchase the properties that the <br />Council has passed resolutions on, if the opportunity presented itself. Mr. Yada stated we <br />needed to focus on what we thought the top priorities were. If we refocus on this list, <br />hopefully, the Council would be more focused on what resolutions they pass for <br />acquisition. <br />Mr. Flores clarified-that the resolutions that the Council passed, were the properties that <br />was on their list; with the exception of Honoli`i. The Mayor selected what he thought <br />should move forward off of this Commission's list and submitted his list to the Council. <br />Mr. Flores stated the problem was that there was no order on how to proceed with the <br />resolutions. That is why it was suggested that this Commission goes through those <br />properties and give a priority on how to proceed <br />Mr. Yada stated his opinion was that this Commission may have to improve the process, <br />it may come down to refocusing and being more focused in their process, and that in turn <br />would assist the Council to be more focused in what they do. <br />Mr. Campbell stated that the prioritization appears to fall with the Department of Finance <br />once the resolutions has passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.