Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Hecht talked about the approval of resolutions by the Hawai.`i County Council (Council) <br />authorizing the County to purchase lands i.e. Puaagua`a, Pa`o`o and K.aiholena. She highlighted that <br />since property taxes are expected to diminish, the estimated amount deposited into the 2% fiord will <br />probably go down fiom 4 million to 3.5 million. This amount could be used as the down payment <br />for a 50 million dollar bond. <br />She noted that over 200 communities across the United States have floated bonds. This opportunity <br />could give the County a better position to attract matching fiords from State and Federal <br />government. <br />In addition she strongly opposes the use of the 2% monies towards park maintenance and stresses. <br />that it's a betrayal of voter's trust. <br />Ms. Garcia asked Ms. Hecht what she wants the Commission to do. Ms. Hecht asked if the <br />Commission would be comfortable writing a letter to the Council recommending that monies from <br />the 21/6 fund be used as a down payment for an open space bond. <br />Ms. Garcia asked where the money would come from if the County does not have enough money in <br />the 20A fund. Ms. Hecht replied that the bonds would be limited to how much could be paid by <br />Property taxes. <br />Mr. Flores noted that in -a prior meeting with a representative from the County Finance Department <br />(FD), it was discussed that if the county leverages bonds it affects their fiscal ratings which affects <br />the interest of everything else.. He suggested that instead of imposing a 50 million dollar band <br />which could create a "shock factor" the amount should be left open which could open the way for <br />more support. Ms. Hecht noted that the 50 million dollar bond amount was based on a 4 million <br />dollar deposit when property values were at their highest. If the Council authorized that, you <br />wouldn't go out and use the money all at once, it would also depend on whether the property was <br />available for purchase. <br />In addition, Ms. Hecht stated that as far as the bond rating goes, there is many other factors and not <br />only how much is borrowed as the County is significantly below the fifteen percent rate that is set <br />by the State constitution. <br />Ms. Springer asked Ms. Hecht if the 50 million dollar bond could be clearly stated as an example <br />given along with an example of a bond at a lower rate. <br />Ms. Garcia expressed her concern that there will be no money for management and maintenance if <br />the bond monies can only be used for acquisition. Ms. Hecht replied that property values am <br />depressed and projected to be de- valued by 30 to 50 percent which means you can still acquire <br />properties and have it developed as funds become available. <br />Ms. Springer asked Ms. Self if she could comment on Ms. Hecht's question regarding a change to <br />the open space ordinance. Ms. Self replied that this question should be answered by Mr. Harry <br />Yada or someone from the FD. The Council would have the authority to change the ordinance; <br />however the FD would have to address the open space bond request. <br />-2- <br />