Laserfiche WebLink
MS. NICHOLSON: With? <br /> MS. WONG: With, I don't care. Which is better? <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: With is probably better. Does that work for everybody? And so <br /> then would we also then change that as the heading for the Executive Summary? <br /> MS. WONG: Yes. <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: But you've noted that in your draft? <br /> MS. WONG: No. <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: We'll remember that one. Next item. <br /> MS. WONG: On Part 1, to delete the word Overarching and just use Cost and Revenue <br /> Concerns for the County of Hawaii. I like real brief things. <br /> MS. O'HARA: Yeah, we could do that. <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: So I guess we should talk about whether we want to change those <br /> headings in the document too. <br /> MS. O'HARA: Oh, absolutely. I think that if we change it in here, we want to change it <br /> there. <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: So, we're adding some words to the Executive Summary. Is <br /> everyone okay with deleting Overarching both in the Table of Contents and then it <br /> would also be on page 6. Does that work for everyone? <br /> MS. O'HARA: Yes. <br /> MS. WONG: Part 1, B, Process and Procedures, I guess I changed it to COGC <br /> Strategy of Process and Procedures. I guess I suggested the change because it was a <br /> passive and to state it as COGC Strategy of Process and Procedures is to indicate that <br /> we had a strategy all along. Yes? No? <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: Discussion on that? I find your revision to be a little esoteric. I kind <br /> of like the clarity of what we have now. Other discussion? <br /> MR. MATSUDA: I'm in favor of how it is now. <br /> MS. O'HARA: I would just stick with what we have. <br /> MS. WONG: Okay. <br /> MS. NICHOLSON: Okay, so we'll not change that in the report or in the Table of <br /> Contents. <br /> 3 <br />